Talk:Office of the Chief Actuary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

notes on article[edit]

I am starting a page on the Office of Chief Actuary. the information i am using comes from their website and related sources and is in the public domain. i also have their permission to write the article and use their material, and am working with their PR person. I want to describe the role of the actuary and actuarial estimates in our social welfare system. Since social security is a partisan political issue, i will endeavor to make the article apolitical. the article will apply to Canada and perhaps other nations. joe 16:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great, Joe. I have my hands full with other articles and RL, but I'll try to help out where I can. -- Avi 17:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious references[edit]

How can this article have so many references when it is so short? There appear to be more references than text. How can there be so many references with so few footnotes? The references listed seem pretty dubious as article references. The "references" section looks more like it should be an external links section. Even then, many of the articles linked to seem inappropriate for an external links section. --JHP (talk) 04:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history, it looks like this article rarely gets edited. It's had few real changes since being created three years ago. Therefore, rather than leaving the references section for someone else to sort out, I'm just going to delete the whole section. If someone thinks some of the references are actually appropriate and useful, they can resurrect them from the history. --JHP (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the Actuary[edit]

Just a note, it appears that in the United States there is an Office of the Chief Actuary, which is part of the Social Security Administration, and there is also an Office of the Actuary, which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services. Hopefully an editor with more knowledge than me will make a distinction between the two in the article. I actually came here while trying to look up the Office of the Actuary. --JHP (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]