Talk:Nokia X6-00

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to List of Nokia products.

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging this to the List of Nokia products is a silly idea. If Nokia flagship is not notable, then what is? Netrat (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is notable enough now that the phone is for sale. Maybe the template should be removed? Exox (talk) 13:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second the thought that proposal to merge was a silly idea; In theory, the proposal is to remove all the product wikis. There are 100s of active links on List of Nokia products to other products (including X6), what will happen to them? will they all be removed and merge into one huge article? hameed (talk) 13:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The specifications list a 17.8" (45cm) touch screen, I'm sure that's a typo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.31.198.97 (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The specifications list microSDHC yet according to Nokia UK website the X6 does not come with a card reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.47.130 (talk) 01:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name Nokia X6 or Nokia X6-00?[edit]

I prefer to have the article under the name Nokia X6-00 because Nokia may release Nokia X6-01 later (see e.g. Nokia C6) and then it is more work to correct all the links than now. I am not going to correct all the links when it has become much more work to do it. Andries (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nokia_X6 name. The last model always named "Nokia X6" and put in that article link to older. So Nokia_X6 will always show the latest model. In that article small note/link to older model. (F.ex. name Nokia_C6-01 to Nokia_C6 and put into it note for older model Nokia_C6-00. Just advise for future procedures.)Jack007 (talk) 19:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nokia X6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]