Talk:Nokia E61

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nokia E61 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finland

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pointless section?[edit]

Is there any value in a section of things that aren't included? It's never going to be complete, since it's an infinite list, any anything selected is just going to represent a POV approach to what this kind of handset 'should' have.

Further, is it worth having things like lists of GSM codes and 'tips'? Wikipedia isn't a manual and this information is available elsewhere.

Failing any good reasons to keep, I plan to remove these.

Wibbble 20:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've now removed these sections. I'll try and get a picture of the handset at some point this week and add it to the article.

Wibbble 20:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i was looking here for the code to show the mac address, because i was here once before and knew its here. so i was shocked when i realized that it had disapeared. i found it usefull! please revert this! these codes are not GSM codes, they are nokia specific. i think removing them is not a good idea, unless you make a link to a page where these codes are described. important is that this information is somewhere in the wiki. rather here than nowhere! -- 84.72.80.79 02:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These codes are not specific to the E61, and a list of codes isn't appropriate encyclopaedic content. I'm sure there's other sources for this information which are more suitable for lists of technical information, and it's possible to start a Nokia-specific wiki. Wibbble 18:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These codes are knowledge and who are you to say what's appropriate for an encyclopaedic and what not? So could you tell me the reason why these codes should not be part of Wikipedia? I admit, that these codes are not special codes only for the Nokia E61, but as long as there is no entry in Wikipedia for all of nokias special codes and a structure that says which code belongs to which cellphone model, it should be content of the entry for the Nokia E61. By the way, what criteria should a topic fullfill, so that it is allowed to be part of an encyclopedia? Maybe these codes would match such criterias. At least they are useful knowledge.
Path1981 11:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See: WP:NOT, in particular:

Instruction manuals. While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instructions or advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes. Note that this does not apply to the Wikipedia: namespace, where "how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself are appropriate, such as Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia. If you're interested in a how-to style manual, you may want to look at Wikihow or our sister project Wikibooks.

Wibbble 14:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows the site's you mentioned?!? NOBODY?? I mean, these codes are not included in the manual that came with the cellphone.The codes are not a howto. What is the fucking problem with putting the codes into this article? I mean, i dont want to offend you, i just dont understand. If think Wikipedia and all the topics it contains are information-gathering-points. And because wikipedia has many hyperlinks to other articles it becomes a nice information-network. So where would one look to find the information he needs? Propably he would start with a nokia-article in wikipedia (maybe google showed him the wikipedia-entry) if he searches cellphonecodes. And there he should find the codes or at least a hyperlink to the codes. Dont you think so? Or do you just want to write down the useless knowledge wich nobody needs? I mean wikipedia is for everyone and should be helpful. And i dont think these codes would make the article a bad article. I have to admit, that you are right, when you say that these codes are not only for the Nokia E61, but when you say there is no place in Wikipedia for these codes, then i think you are wrong. I mean, these codes are really basic informations and not a howto or tutorial. Wikipedia is a modern encyclopdia and because many people have access to it you cannot compare it to traditional ones. And about your BLOCKQUOTE :) The codes are not included in the instruction manual and it is a description of functional abilities of the cellphone. its not an advise nor a suggestion nor a howto. the codes are not a tutorial and not a wlakthrough and stuff like that, so YOU HAVE NO REASON TO REMOVE IT, dont you think? (maybe the way it is implemented in wikipedia should be changed if you want, but i think its important information and not advises or howto.) It doesnt contain instructions to a human mind :) Path1981 18:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think what you've said here really supports your position: a lot of this information is in the userguide, or is otherwise available on more appropriate websites. There's other forums for distributing this stuff - not least Nokia's own discussion boards, which could be linked to. I don't think you've really quite understood the purpose of wikipedia - it's not just a collection of 'all knowledge' (in the way that something like [e2] is), it's supposed to keep to an 'encyclopaedic' standard. This means that lists of codes or other technical/useguide type information isn't appropriate unless it's as an example or something like that. I don't think you've provided anything to support keeping userguide-type information in this article. Wibbble 21:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Path1981 is totally correct on this matter. Useful information should not be excluded from wikipedia and this would not constitute a how-to, but instead is simply useful. Wikipedia is and, aims to be the first point of call for information on a wide variety of things. Traditional encyclopaedias where invented long (ages) before mobile phones or computers. As an E61 user I would find such information very useful and may not have realised how I could use my phone differently if not for the codes (lack of) inclusion (and ensuing argument) in this article. Wiki is a place to share knowledge not shut it out. There is no reason based on logic nor wick's guidelines to have removed this content, furthermore if you want to hark back to old style encyclopaedias go burn some pages from them instead of vandalising wiki. --- Stefan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.194.2.159 (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2006

Again, I refer to WP:NOT and also note that an article with this information created by Path1981 was deleted. User guide type material is not suitable encyclopaedic material. I think you misunderstand the goals of wikipedia and might want to read up a little on those. My edits have most certainly NOT been vandalism - vandalism is deliberately adding nonsense or removing useful content for the purpose of disrupting wikipedia, not a simple disagreement on what is appropriate. Your accusation of vandalism is inappropriate. Wibbble 12:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I think the codes like *#0000# to show firmware version and things of that nature should be included on Wikipedia.

Look at the Wikipedia about ping: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ping

By the quoted standards most of that article should be gutted, since it explains a network tool in detail and how to use it and what the results look like. If you'd like me to write up the Nokia codes with sample results to meet your accepted standards, I'll do that. --Ryan Sinn (talk) 03:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I've added a picture of the E61 that I took with the Nokia N73 this evening. It's not a brilliant picture, but it's better than nothing. I'd be happy to see it replaced with something better! (Sadly, the battery died on the Nokia N93 before I could take a picture with that - it would've come out much better.)

I've replaced the photo -- but I don't know that it's better... I might make another attempt shortly to shoot a photo with the display at the menu screen. I just didn't want my personal info on Wikipedia :D I'm in the process of wiping out my old E61 (I have two) and I could shoot a photo with the default layout at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryansinn (talk • contribs) 05:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External Links[edit]

There's a really large number of external links, many of which are just to E61-releated blogs. I'm going to edit this section in line with WP:EL and remove the blogs and most of the other non-suitable material. any suggestions for sites to retain (other than Nokia's) are welcome! Wibbble 18:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Button Count[edit]

I think the number of buttons is supposed to be 45, not 46. The calculation performed for the current result was most likely (4*10)+6, however the space button on the bottom row takes the place of two keys. Phobius 23:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Nokia E61i[edit]

There is a campaign going on to delete mobile phone articles. I have tried to resist, but we also need to do some cleanup. I have been merging articles on European / North American version. I cannot see why we need a separate article for the i model. I see no diffrence but the new keyboard. -- Petri Krohn 02:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Different firmware versions, and a camera. I'm not 100% convinced that that makes it worth a separate article, but it is more significant than just a different keyboard. Wibbble 20:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:E61i.jpg[edit]

Image:E61i.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

0503002212[edit]

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.109.180.242 (talk) 12:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]