Talk:Nixie (drone)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nixie (drone) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

This article describes an invention that I believe has a potential to change perception of drones and is a great case for civilian use of drones. ~Zina~ (talk) 08:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following discussions with user User:DGG, the article has been improved. Moreover, winning the Intel competition was a condition for this article to meet notability requirements, which is now met. I will do my best to further improve this article, but invite you the person reading it to contribute to either discussion or the article itself. ~Zina~ (talk) 08:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's considered a rather bold thing to move one's own article out of draft space, rather than ask for review, but it isn't prohibited. I am not going to list it again for deletion, but I suggest that the article can be improved by some condensations about the details of the various roles of the developers. This is too much detail for the importance to presently support. I started. with one sentence. It helps to emove everything that might possible reflect a conflict or interest. DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DGG, I apologize that I incorrectly understood that article can be moved out of the draft space into Wikipedia space after meeting your suggested notability requirements, whereas you meant that would be sufficient for a review. As you suggested, I made several changes to make article more neutral and will continue these efforts. Again, if there is anything specific not yet covered, please go ahead to make the changes.~Zina~ (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Nixie drone → Nixie (drone) – The product seems to be called a "Nixie" rather than a "Nixie drone". McGeddon (talk) 09:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

McGeddon, this is a good suggestion. I moved the article.~Zina~ (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: page moved. ~Zina~ (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Nixie (drone) be renamed and moved to Nixie drone.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

Request to remove advertisement tag[edit]

Hello McGeddon and DGG,

I did my best to rewrite the article in a more neutral tone and added a few more references (there are quite a bit more articles on this topic now). Would you consider removing the advertisement tag if you think the tone is now acceptable? If now, please suggest the necessary changes. Thanks in advance for your time! ~Zina~ (talk) 07:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking a look at the article, and for all your improvements DGG! I won't remove the ad tag just yet and will try co continue improving the article and its tone. ~Zina~ (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made some additional improvements to the article tone, and now ready to remove the "advertisement tone" tag. If any changes are still needed, please feel free to suggest. ~Zina~ (talk) 04:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]