Talk:Nirmala Sitharaman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because all the citations necessary are in place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.77.242 (talk) 03:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removal of few categories without proper explaination[edit]

The following categories which have been on this page for multiple years, are being suddenly deleted without proper explanation.
1) Category:Rajya Sabha members from Karnataka
2) Category:Telugu politicians
3) Category:Rajya Sabha members from Andhra Pradesh
4) Category:Telugu people

I am providing sources for the above categories, just in case some thinks these are not fully established.
She is Elected from Karnataka, for category 1).
1) http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-wins-3-rajya-sabha-seats-from-karnataka-bjp-gets-1-1418017
She has been elected from Andhra pradesh in the past for categories 2 & 3
2)http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140604/nation-politics/article/bjp-leader-nirmala-sitharaman-gets-njr-rajya-sabha-seat
3)http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140604/nation-politics/article/bjp-leader-nirmala-sitharaman-gets-njr-rajya-sabha-seat
4) She is married to a person from Andhra Pradesh and lives in Hyderabad in Telangana, permanently.

If any of you have issues, with the above categories please explain here before deleting then bluntly.
Ripapart (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - per WP:CATV, "It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories." If there is no content in the article establishing the person as being of Telugu ethnicity or whatever the contentious material is, then the categories should not be added. Content first, cats second. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cyphoidbomb So have we established that the categories of Category:Rajya Sabha members from Andhra Pradesh and Category:Rajya Sabha members from Karnataka are to stay on the page? @Vensatry, I request you to assume goodfaith, I have started this discussion on talk page only to resolve differences in opinion, if you think I have pushed POV, please look at your editing aswell, so did you indulge in POV pushing, by deleting the two categories out of the four, listed above. Ripapart (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, that's an established fact. Before you talk about WP:AGF, I suggest you please consider WP:DTR. Vensatry (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2019[edit]

Vandalism in article. please revert it.

Please delete the following

Sitharaman is India's second female defence minister who became shame to defence ministry through infamous rafale deal and armtwisting money making tactics she employs. She doesn’t have any qualifications to become defence and commerce ministers of India as she is neither a popular person in Indian diaspora or never even own a single elections in Indian democracy. She is not even a well know economist, looks like just an ordinary house wife who used to give few speeches in her free time. She is became defaming face of RSS in BJPs present Indian government. Her inefficient governance and acts as Indian Defence minister is going to effect India for generations. 106.51.67.207 (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal insertions removed. --jojo@nthony (talk) 11:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works[edit]

The subject of the article has been intervisted by the Indian journalist Sonia Singh (sourced here). Nirmala Sitharaman also authored the 2019-2020 Union Budget which is referenced on WorldCat.

I hope that a shotr list of works will help to improve the WP article.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 23:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claims regarding tenure as Finance Minister[edit]

In the section regarding her tenure as the finance minister, the following line is present:

"and the GDP of the country was said to have seen massive growth positively with historical context."

The reference to the line is: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/tax-upliftment-poor-backward-nirmala-sitharaman-modi-govt-9th-anniversary-8634687/ which consists of claims made during a political conference. The claims are made by the subject themselves regarding their performance, which can't be taken as an objective measure of their economic performance.

The other reference links to a WEF article(https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/india-uk-fifth-largest-economy-world/), which talks about India rising to the 5th position in terms of GDP growth, but it does not back up the claim made in the sentence referenced above.

The sentence should either be removed (as it is inaccurate and the reference doesn't indicate they made the said claim themselves) or should be at the minimum, be affixed with a suitable disclaimer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The shear stress of it all (talkcontribs) 04:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

banking customer care services including RBI banking ombusdan[edit]

Regarding digital india programme launch by Our Prime minister Honrable Narendra Modi Sir. as we see in banking sector including RBI websites and other platform of bank related complaints it is totally a waste of time and precious money and a hurdles in complainning through online i.e websites of bank /RBI/Banking ombusdan /Toll free no. 59.94.210.210 (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]