Talk:Nippon Columbia

Japan: Business and economy / Music Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 21:49, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Business and economy task force.

This article is supported by the Music task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Columbia Readymade's original name?[edit]

The IP-address editor who first added the current label-names list stated Columbia Readymade was "founded as ********* records, tokyo and renamed as Readymade Records". A short row of asterisks is ordinarily used in English-language text to censor an expletive; but expletives routinely exist in the English-language Wikipedia as they are almost always entitled to First Amendment protection in the U.S. When used in encyclopedic form, expletives generally do *NOT* "lack() serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value", the third requirement of the obscenity exception to the First Amendment (per Miller v. California, upheld by the Supreme Court less than a month ago in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association), even when the other two requirements are met. (Example: the article on the Cee Lo Green hit goes by its uncensored title, "Fuck You!"--*NOT* "F**k You", "F*** You", "F U", "Forget You", or any other substitute for its expletive, which also has its own article. It can still be censored from U.S. airwaves per FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, but not from Wikipedia.)

Also, even if Nippon Columbia was forced to abandon that name due to copyright and/or trademark conflicts with another company, it's still appropriate to use in this article, as in the U.S. merely citing that name would still qualify as "fair use" in both its copyright and trademark forms. (Example: "This Can't Be Yogurt", the original name of the TCBY yogurt chain, is still used in the TCBY article for that purpose, despite being abandoned after an infringement lawsuit by competitor I Can't Believe It's Yogurt!.) "Fair use" also covers internationally-split trademarks when used appropriately, as in Nippon Columbia's own trademarks (owned by Columbia Records everywhere *but* Japan).

If anyone knows what Columbia Readymade's original name was, please add it to the article--even if it's an expletive or a copyright and/or trademark conflict. If it's a Japanese language term, translate it into English if possible (if you can't do it yourself, try Google Translate or Yahoo! Babel Fish, or if on a website use Google Chrome), then post all available forms (English, Japanese characters, etc.) as per the examples in the article's first paragraph. --RBBrittain (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]