This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
I think a refreshment course on Macedonia (terminology) is needed. He could be Macedonian, Macedonian, Macedonian or even Macedonian or Macedonian. The fact of the matter is he turns out to be the first. Everything else is irrelevant. And nationalistic newspaper are not an ok source, as you know. I've left the one that actually had any relevance to the article and to the sentence it references.--LaveolT 15:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know what your problem is, but certainly it is not the referencing. However, you are not realizing the actual facts, and those are that Vapcarov called himself just as Macedonian (not all that regional terminology invented on Wikipedia). That could be seen by the quote I provided and his work as well. I know that you are, again, not familiar with this topic but you still are trying to push just the BG point of view. I concluded that according to you and the BG policy it is more important what his mother said, how relevant that could be, than Vapcarov himself. --MacedonianBoy 16:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yet more rants. Do you have anything substantial to say or you're just going to write the same stuff everywhere? And nothing is invented on Wikipedia. I am a Macedonian as well - does this mean I am not something else as well? And, yes, it is about sources - yellow papers are out by default. --LaveolT 17:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Macedonian? No comment about that. Why did you delete his quote? --MacedonianBoy (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ETHNIC MACEDONIAN! FOR THE LOVE OF HISTORY. LET'S NOT CONFUSE NATION WITH STATE. THE "FORMER YOGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" WAS CREATED BUT A MERE 40 YEARS AGO. ITS PEOPLE NEVER CALLED THEMSELVES MACEDONIANS EARLIER THAN 60-80 YEARS AGO. WHAT IS "ETHNIC" MACEDONIAN? CAN WE GET SERIOUS ON THIS WIKIPEDIA FOR ONCE? IT'S BECOME THE BULLSHIT PLACE IN NEARLY EVERY ARTICLE FOR DISTORTING FACTS, HISTORY AND INFORMATION ANY WAY EVERY CLOWN SEES FIT. 79.129.208.196 (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:Lena Sterjovska, Wikipedia works based on reliable sources, not on personal opinions. Also here is not a place for pushing fringe theories. Please, stop the edit war and provide here reliable sources for discussion. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
