Talk:Nexus 6P/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2015[edit]

Please remove "Nexus 6P scores very low in the durability test. The display can be cracked easily and the device can be bent without much force.[12]" The linked source contains updated information that clarifies, why the original durability test is methodologically wrong. Ondra.nekola (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

6P bending "known issue"[edit]

The sentence "The device chassis was susceptible to bending under pressure, such as when carried tightly in a user's pocket." should be removed. The linked references do not support this claim. The YouTube video, which is the source for all three references, shows someone explicitly trying, with maximum force applied, to bend the phone. This is not the same as bending "when carried in a user's pocket". Also, as is visible on the linked YouTube channel, all phones he has tested this way so far, do in fact bend. So the fact that the 6P does too is not noteworthy to specify as a "known issue". WikiJoop (talk) 11:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think 'bendgate' as a controversy was covered widely enough that something neutral could probably be said about it in the article, but the current text is not it. As you've said, the claim that it bends "such as when carried tightly in a user's pocket" is not in the sources provided, and when that's removed, "The device chassis was susceptible to bending under pressure" is no longer an interesting or specific claim about the 6P - i.e. most things bend when you deliberately try to bend them. – Steel 12:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In case anyone needs them, the sources were http://www.techinsider.io/googles-nexus-6p-way-easier-to-bend-than-iphone-6-2015-11 http://bgr.com/2015/11/04/nexus-6p-bend-design/ and http://www.techtimes.com/articles/102815/20151104/nexus-6p-bendgate-not-over-yet-new-bend-test-shows-freshly-unboxed-nexus-6p-easily-breaks-in-half.htm – Steel 12:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Nexus 6P bends with less force than the iPhone 6. So either this issue is keep here or it is removed from the iPhone 6 article. What do you guys suggest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.13.243 (talk) 14:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would rephrase the text here so it's closer to the sources, and avoid making up new claims such as the pocket thing above. – Steel 17:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2016[edit]

Please add Nexus M1 (codenamed Marlin) as the successor of the Nexus 6P, as it already exists in the Geekbench. 139.195.29.37 (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete successor[edit]

There is no Nexus 4P, and the article describing it is obviously misleading. Frantisek.nesveda (talk) 08:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! – Steel 09:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B4+12 Carrier Aggregation[edit]

The page was missing a supported CA Band Combo for the North American version: B4+B12. This is documented on the relevant FCC filing but there is no way to directly link to it for a citation. This page shows all filings for the Nexus 6P and the CA combos are listed under "RF Exposure Report", page 14. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchaika (talk • contribs) 14:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nexus_6P/Archive_1&oldid=830182618"