Talk:New York Women's Agenda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Member organizations are what exactly?[edit]

organizations (non-profit corporations, etc) which contibute money ot resources to nywa? there are the other "member organization" levels, sponsor, supporter etc. What is this signifiance? 

Many non-profit organizations have "corporate members" and afilliated groups. this is not encyclopedic. The goal here is not to archive every bit of information from the NYWA's website. Vinithehat (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are corporate members, but none of them is listed here. They donate money to support the work of the group. This is a not for profit group of women's organizations. The member organizations listed pay a nominal membership fee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.88.8 (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted the links to the website for our member organizations. Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.88.8 (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because Wikipedia is not a link farm. Vinithehat (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Member organizations are groups that contribute to the funding of the organization. it is not appropriate to list them here. This is information that can be found on the organizations website where it belongs. Many non-profit organizations have members like this, they are likewise not listed here. for example, the American_Museum_of_Natural_History has dozens, perhaps hundreds of corporate members and contributing organizations. These are NOT listed on its Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is not a depository or memorial or any type or form of acknowledgment of the contributions of organizations' contributions of this type.

unambiguous copyvio[edit]

[1] there is a 100% copy paste from this website. I understand that this wiki is about this org, and the person creating these copyvios is most likely from this org. However, it is stil a copyvio and needs to be rewritten in an original manner or presented as unambiguously quoted material.Vinithehat (talk) 07:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what do you want to do. Put quotation marks around the section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.88.8 (talk) 21:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it would be good if it were rewritten in an original manner or presented as quoted material. Wikipedia:MOSQUOTE#Quotations Vinithehat (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

external links[edit]

that's a very reasonable length