This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
A fact from New Scotland Avenue (Troop B) Armory appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I think these are incorrect, they point to somewhere in Otsego County. Circéus (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed they were ... a whole degree of longitude! (Since I had never found that number to be in error, now matter how egregious the minutes and seconds were, I never thought it would be wrong and didn't correct it. Wow! Thanks!). Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
