This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1) Shellac 78 record era company. I argue that record companies from this era tend to be notable in themselves, as making records in that era needed a considerable amount of industrial investment, quite unlike how easy it was to start what was called a "record company" in recent decades.
2)Important in the New Orleans traditional jazz revival era. If the New Orleans jazz revival is notable, this label is.
3) Notable musicians who Wikipedia has articles on recorded for label.
I don't really know what "notable in themselves" means. But I do know these comments fail to distinguish between "I think this is important" and Wikipedia's rules for notability. Consequently, a lot of other people's time and effort gets wasted. Everything on Wikipedia comes from published sources. Availability of material takes precedence, otherwise there's nothing to write. We're not fiction writers. We don't make this stuff up. Vmavanti (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
