Talk:New Day Films

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
	This article needs an appropriate infobox template.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Neutral Point of View[edit]

I have tagged this article for Neutral Point of View because of the following sentence:"Operating as a cooperative since its inception in 1971, New Day Films is democratically run by our more than 100 filmmaker members." The First person pronoun gives the impression that the author a part of the organization. This NPOV instance may actually be copyvio, as the following text is quoted from the "Introduction" area of the organization's page (url is http://www.newday.com/mission.html):"Democratically run by our more than 100 filmmaker members". This is the same text as what is bolded above in the sentence taken from the article. Please assist me in determining which this is. Thank you. Poker5463 (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC) edited by, at and on, respectively, Poker5463 (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and still trying to figure out how it works. I don't work for New Day films but did take part of that sentence from their site. Should I take out the "our" in that sentence? also, how do you add your signature and timestamp?

--WCP2009 (talk) 19:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WCP2009,

I'm new too, and I would suggest reading through the various policies. Also, before copying text from a webpage, check for a copyrright statement or a free use statement, et cetera. On New Day Films' webpage, at the bottom, they have a copyright statement. Taking out the "our" would help the NPOV, but the rest of the sentence is still copyvio. Your best bet is to not only remove the "our, but to rewrite the entire sentence. (I just checked this site, and the entire sentence is right there.) Also, if you type four tildes after your post (a tilde lookes like this: ~) Wikipedia will insert a date and time stamp with your signature. I hope this helps. I will check back in about 2 hours and look for this change, if the sentence is still there, I will mark the article as a candidate for speedy deletion under G12. This code refers to the general section, list number 12. Thank you. Poker5463 (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up the text and removed the NPOV tag. The article needs better referencing. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STUB?[edit]

Is this a Stub? It looks to short to be an article to me. Poker5463 ^Repeater 18:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

needs some TLC[edit]

THis article only references itself - Victuallers (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]