Talk:Nerdkween

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I believe that the Nerdkween page should remain on Wikipedia. The artist's label is currently on Wikipedia and the artist's contributions are noteworthy in the field of lo-fi pop music. She is one of the first female African American songwriters put out this type of music.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Monicadevon (talkcontribs) June 26, 2008

OK, I will try to keep it, (OK I looked at her photo :-). But some one else may propode it for del at any time, and I will have to flag the article as well. Get working on proving Wikipedia:Notability (music) --Triwbe (talk) 20:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish WP:MUSIC

==

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Music, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Monicadevon (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —Triwbe (talk) 20:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nerdkween. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]