Talk:Near Death (comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

File:Near death.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Near death.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has been addressed. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed[edit]

Following a request on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment for a reassessment of quality, I have done so and raised it to C-quality.

The relevant standards are:

Start: "An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources."
C: "The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup."
B: "The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards."

The article has plenty of sources and is well written. However, I feel it could do with more details such as why the comic went on hiatus, did the graphic novel planned for 2019 eventuate, what happened to the television adaptation, and some more plot details. To me this easily makes a C, and could reach B with a bit more information. HenryCrun15 (talk) 20:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]