Talk:Nalpathiyonnu (41)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nalpathiyonnu (41) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Duplicates an existing article[edit]

This article duplicates with a reviewed article Nalpathiyonnu. One is mentioned the name in digits in and another one in words.

I would merge this but this is created before the reviewed one. Also, I believe the standing article should rename to Nalpathiyonnu (41) because it is the name used by the makers. The9Man | (talk) 10:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, I would like to know your take on this. The9Man | (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The9Man, I think you're right that the articles should be merged, and your suggested alternative title does seem appropriate based on the sources cited at Nalpathiyonnu. As for which one should be the merge target, it really doesn't matter as long as you properly attribute any merged content in an edit summary. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]