Talk:Mystery Fun House (video game)

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (5 participants)
Joshua Tomar (5 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (nom)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (nom)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Untitled[edit]

This is one of those articles that if it's deleted, about twenty other similar articles will also have to go. Czolgolz (talk) 03:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting this article seems pretty shoddy - it's a piece of classic interactive fiction - that is important due to the constraints and the history of when it was created. I'm not sure what Wiki demand to embellish the article - but it's bordering on criminal to lose this history from a supposed top reference source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.30.212.79 (talk) 23:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We'd have to delete a bunch of other Scott Adams games. I've plaid this one beginning to end, there may not be any sort of sorce availabe for reference. Czolgolz (talk) 03:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An ancient discussion, but thanks to increased digitization, there are actually sources available for this. Quite a few have been added, and I'll see if I can find some time to add some more. --tronvillain (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]