Talk:Myogenic response

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This redirect has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Combine Pages Suggestion[edit]

This page should be combined with Myogenic mechanism

Yes! I looked at this talk because I couldn't find what I needed and that exact information is in the first sentence of the "Myogenic mechanism" article - which I might never have found. lifeform (talk) 05:40, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 December 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. See no reason to put this off any longer since editors appear to have this mixed bowl of soup under control. Happy New Year to All! (closed by page mover) Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 13:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Myogenic contraction → Myogenic response – The target is already a redirect; this move is in preparation for a 3-page merge to the new title, and is designed to keep a chunk of the edit history for the oldest of the 3 articles at the target. See merge discussion at Talk:Myogenic mechanism#Merger proposal Klbrain (talk) 15:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Klbrain, since this involves multiple pages, it should be discussed. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as per the above, it seems that this move request is directly affected by any result at Talk:Myogenic mechanism#Merger proposal, but ~~no conclusion/finalized merge has been made at/per that discussion yet~~ the merge has yet to be performed. (Updated by – Steel1943 (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)) Most likely, if no resolution is made there, this discussion may need to be closed to "no consensus".[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move per nom. I see an unanimous consensus for merge there, no reason to block the procedure. No such user (talk) 12:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @No such user: Sorry, I meant that the merge has yet to be performed. Steel1943 (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Steel1943: I didn't mean to be condescending to your relist, just made a general note that we shouldn't leave things half-done. As far as I can tell, the merge has been performed: Myogenic response and Bayliss effect both redirect to ~~this article~~. Edit, sorry: to Myogenic mechanism; this article hasn't been merged yet indeed. No such user (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.