Talk:My Fellow Americans

Review

I took away the review entry. It didn't say anything about the movie, it only contained some thoughts of Roger Ebert.

I added a marker for the "Timeline Section" as it contains original research. Aml830 (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I have issues with the Timeline section

I personally think this is a waste. It should just point out the inconsistencies between the film and the actual historical events. However, I won't erase it, unless someone agrees with me or nobody really cares about this section. --Surten (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Surten

I think it should be deleted. It's stupid. Trying to fit a fictional story into real world timeline, no matter how you approach it, it OBVIOUSLY will never work. Also, I just saw the movie, and for crying out loud, its a COMEDY - there's no attempt to relate to the real world, except for jokes about other presidents.. who is narrow-minded enough to even TRY and link it to the real world? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.107.24.213 (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

It's all original research, and speculative as well. I agree it should be deleted. In fact, might as well do it right now, since there haven't been any objections... --Fru1tbat (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Quotes section removed

I've removed the 'Quotes' section of this article. Wikipedia isn't intended to collect witty quotations. Wikiquote might be a more appropriate place for a list of quotations such as these, and can be linked to from the article. If there is indeed some particular quotation (or more than one, but not very many) that is very well known, it may be worth including in the article proper--the synopsis might conceivably be enhanced by inclusion of a select few quotations from the film.

I do recommend against simply reverting my edit and reproducing the 'Quotes' section in full, though--besides being a pretty clear failure to abide by our non-free content criteria, they don't really add anything to the article as lone quotations, out of context. Remember that our goal is to provide an informative encyclopedia, not a list of clever turns of phrase. --Sopoforic (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Fellow Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808153702/http://rutherfordtourism.com/links/index.php?CID=36 to http://www.rutherfordtourism.com/links/index.php?CID=36

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)