Talk:Murray McLachlan (musician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Knighthood"[edit]

This subject list his "knighthood" as of the "Order of St John of Jerusalem". I have accordingly removed the post-nominals "OStJ", which refer to the Venerable Order of St John, which is a royal order of chivalry under the British Crown. Similarly, in the article body, I have removed reference to a different order, the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, into which it was also asserted the subject was knighted. Clearly, there is some confusion here. A search of the London Gazette shows that the subject has not received entry into the British order. Likewise, the subject's own website does not refer to either body mentioned above. As many Wiki editors know, there is a substantial amount of "smoke and mirrors" about the "Order of St John", the whole concept being drawn into disrepute by self-styled orders and individual gong-seekers. Until and unless there are more facts known in this case, the article should not presume other honours than those claimed by the subject. Rorate (talk) 19:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Murray McLachlan (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]