Talk:Murder of Ann Harrison

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Prisoner?[edit]

Is prisoner the right way to disambugiate this guy's name? Someday he'll either be executed, released, or die in prison. I think 'criminal' or 'murderer' is a better way to disambugiuate this article. Czolgolz (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, now that he has been executed, "prisoner" feels wrong. I propose "convicted killer". --Lambiam 12:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indexme (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Prisoner or inmate is used correctly in my opinion as he died in that status.[reply]

Conservative?[edit]

"Alito's vote made headlines because he did not vote with Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice John Roberts, said to be the conservative wing of the court." - the statement is patently false as all four are Roman Catholics. Even the Pope now admits that he is to the left of Barack Obama. Their record proves that as well (Roberts' approval of Obamacare etc) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.149.198.207 (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of this article[edit]

People want to keep an article for a giraffe that was executed, yet this guy can't have an article? Ha! Go Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.102.116.97 (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for a lack of notability of the offender or the victim, and for a lack of legal importance. American executions are banal events. Horrible crime, but rape and murder always are.Pbrower2a (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be kept. That one might think "American executions are banal events," is irrelevant -- this represents historical significance, however small, in terms of involving a serious crime with a lasting impact, in terms of involving high-level federal government action, and in terms of its potential to become a reference for later discussions of the death penalty, sexual assault, murder, the U.S. Supreme Court, the particular justices involved, and so on. Future aggregations of such data would be harmed by losing easy access to this information. A lack of notability of the offender or the victim might be cause for deletion if the article were about a fistfight at a bar, but since we generally agree that murder, rape, the death penalty, and U.S. Supreme Court action are notable things, the offender and the victim become notable through the situation itself, not vice versa. --Techgeist (talk) 06:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbrower2a: and @Techgeist:: If you want to participate in the discussion/debate about the deletion of this article, you should post your input at the following page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Taylor (prisoner). That is the "official" place to do so. Any comments left here on this Talk Page will likely not be considered in the deletion discussion (and final decision). Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Taylor (prisoner). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]