This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
There is much to be done on this article, for one there is an in-depth psychology today article [1] that should be researched.Jacona (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is with the description given to Dakhlalla versus that given to Ms Young. These are two people who, as stated in both articles, were married in a Muslim ceremony but not a Civil one. They were both charged and ultimately found guilty of the SAME crime. Yet, Mr. Dakhlalla has this long drawn out narrative beside his name as a description and Ms Young is simply "Terrorist." I have an issue with this and would like it addressed. Erika19742003 (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Quite simple. As one of the sources cited states, "Prosecutors Wednesday said they agreed Dakhlalla was less at fault and deserved a lighter sentence than Young, who prosecutors have said prodded Dakhklalla toward joining ISIS and planned the pair’s attempt to travel to Turkey"[2] Meanwhile, you are edit-warring to describe him as a terrorist, despite the fact that none of the sources cited does so. If you continue like this, you are likely to find yourself blocked from editing altogether. RolandR (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
