Talk:Moolack Beach

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Impetus[edit]

Along the lines of these articles:

Notability threshhold is demonstrably low. This article ought to meet it easily. VigilancePrime (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, geographic features are almost always considered notable. Katr67 (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiTravel[edit]

The content of this seems more suited to WikiTravel. "Attractions" sections are not particularly encyclopedic. Katr67 (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did I mention I need help wih this? (I put up what I could when I could. Hoping others will come and help... hence the {{Wikify}} tag! VigilancePrime (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC) :-)[reply]

Well, I wanted to give fair warning before I wipe out the attractions section... Katr67 (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I always prefer enlarging articles, but I agree that the attractions ought to go (eventually). Perhaps the blue links therein can be retained (in a different form). Yes, I absolutely want help on it. I have a vision, but it's not like Newport Beach (different Newport) or something that has tons of refs available. Honestly, the references aren't that great either! But, it's a start, and that's what I was after. (Feel free not only to edit it around, but to get others involved!) I promise my feelings won't be hurt! VigilancePrime (talk) 03:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC) :-)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moolack Beach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070502202712/http://www.newportnewstimes.com/articles/2007/01/10/news/news05.txt to http://www.newportnewstimes.com/articles/2007/01/10/news/news05.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]