Talk:Montrose Center/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Montrose Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Montrose Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 14:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm happy to review this article for you. Sorry about the long wait, as you can probably guess, GAN is seriously bogged down right now (albeit no one should have to wait this long for a review). I'll get to closely reading and reviewing the article shortly. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 14:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@Kmwebber: I took a good read through the article and to be brutally honest, a lot of work needs to be done for it to get to GA status. My first issue is the fact that the lede is only two sentences long, which is woefully insufficient for an article with this information. My second big issue with this article is that the history section has some huge information gaps. There is absolutely nothing about the inception of the center (i.e, why it was built in the first place). I'd suggest adding about why people advocated for the building of the town meeting in the first place and then add the standard information (when construction commenced and finished and when the center opened). On top of that, there is almost nothing about the late 1990s or the 2000s, times that were pretty important for the LGBT community. Some of the subsections in the Services section need an expansion too.

With that, I unfortunately am going to have to fail the article. I think the article has great potential, but it just isn't ready to be promoted quite yet. When it's ready for another round at GAN, feel free to notify me and I can either review it again or I can help ensure that it's ready to go. Best of luck with the article! Sportsguy17 (T • C) 01:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.