Talk:Montmorency series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this article could be categorized under historical fiction, juvenile fiction, or adventure/mystery (espionage), and psychology (multiple personalities)

  • this is a terrible name for this article. it should be renamed to montmorency series. this name is misleading and would make one think that it is about the protagonist of the series, yet it is not about him, rather about the series he is in.

I corrected the name of the artcle to montmorency series.

I think this book's status should be more important. after all, it is the greatest book ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.94.230 (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~I love this series :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.87.156.224 (talk) 19:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers?![edit]

Why are there so many spoilers in this article? Somebody should go through it and delete them. I might do some of them but I'm currently quite busy. Rock drum (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPOILERS. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

I have assessed this article as Start class as per the request at WikiProject CHildren's Literature. While there is a large amount of information on the plots of each book, the style is not entirely encylopaedic in these sections, and the remainder of the article lacks content. Also, the entire article lacks adequate, reliable references. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montmorency series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]