Talk:Mommyheads

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

The band was on Geffen records and produced by Don Was!! that's not notable enough?

I have not contributed to this article as of yet, but I think they are definitely a "notable" enough band, and with time I can supply some citations. Please do not remove this article. Sojambi Pinola 06:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be deleted either, and I just added a link, and fixed two others to prove the band's existance. ---- DanTD 02:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion notion is pretty bogus ... is THIS notable enough:
http://www.amazon.com/s/002-6311995-1531200?ie=UTF8&keywords=mommyheads&index=blended

really if it the band is so not notable, how did anyone even find the article to consider deleting it?! 68.54.17.184 23:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant standard for notability is at Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles. It lists many different achievements, any one of which is sufficient. Having an album released by a major label is one of them, and having articles written specifically about them is another. It appears to me that this group qualifies. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Mommyheads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mommyheads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fetid, bongwater-soaked towel[edit]

I half-love that this goofy sentence has remained in the article since October 2008 [1]:

"Live performances from this period, especially in college settings, often included a fetid, bongwater-soaked towel."

Perhaps one could argue it honors the bands capacity for irreverence. I'm leaving it for now, but I dunno.

Sojambi Pinola (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]