Talk:Mohammed Ahmad Said Al Edah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I have a problem with the last editted paragraph in this set of edits. I think it is a mistake to improve the spelling, grammar, or use of punctuation in quoted material.

The phrase "had previously been correctly determined to match" was replaced by the word "fit". This might seem like a shorter, clearer statement. But it is also incorrect. And, in my opinion, it incorrectly states a very important aspect of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals..

The Geneva Conventions, to which the USA is a signatory, states that all captives have to be given the protections of POW status -- until a competent tribunal determines they don't qualify for POW status. AR 190-8 specifies, in detail, how the US Armed Services should conduct Tribunals that fulfilled its treaty obligations. The Bush administration wanted to skip this step. The Supreme Court ruled in Rasul v. Bush, that the Bush administration couldn't skip this step.

The CSRT's task was not to make the determination whether the captives qualified for POW status. Bush asserted this by administrative fiat. The CSRT's task was not to make the determination whether the captives "fit" the definition of "enemy combatant" -- the DoD implied that this determination had already been made -- the role of the CSRT was to review those previously made, secret, informal determinations -- not to make the first determinations themselves.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 22:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names[edit]

I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.

People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do. Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.

And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are.

Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.

Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Mohammed Ahmad Said Al Edah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mohammed_Ahmad_Said_Al_Edah&oldid=1201716596"