Talk:Mirriam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


MirriamMiriam (album)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move? (2)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Ucucha 20:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Miriam (album)Mirriam

  • Revert contentious move, RM still in progress. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • (ref. section #Move? above) Oppose. The writing on the album cover is stylized, and unclear at the resolution in the image (File:Jessi Colter-Mirriam 2.jpg). Also, move Miriam to Miriam (Biblical) and let plain Miriam be the disambig page? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Look closely, and there are definitely two Rs on the cover. Bigger image here. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This nomination should be considered per album cover — it could be a case where Allmusic & al. are wrong. I would love to see a scan of the gramophone record label to see if it matches the cover. Oppose unrelated move of Miriam per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — AjaxSmack 02:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the album is listed as "Miriam" on the listings for purchase from Amazon in the artist own website [1]. And any discussion of moving the page currently at Miriam should be considered separately. olderwiser 23:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.