Talk:Millions (2004 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think a split into 2 articles should happen[edit]

A book article (if the book is that notable) and a film article. As of now, it's just one cluttered article of descriptions of both. RobJ1981 20:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done (Millions (novel). However, I haven't seen the film, so it would be good if someone else could remove/transfer anything from the plot summary which isn't in the film. Robina Fox (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damian's PLAYHOUSE?[edit]

In the book, Damian constantly proclaims that his den, or "playhouse" as is said in the article, is a HERMITAGE. I haven't just changed it in case anyone disagrees with changing it, though. Jake95(talk!) 18:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Millions DVD cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Millions DVD cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classification as a Christian Film[edit]

The film is clearly Christian. Please refrain from altering its categorization.Vordabois 05:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia page offensive to Catholics[edit]

This Wikipedia page is offensive to Catholics.

It refers to the Biblical Saints appearing before Damian as "hallucinations".

I'm a Catholic, and I was raised to believe that people of very deep faith can actually communicate with saints, angels and virgins. In my native country of Argentina, there's a woman, Maria Livia, who communicates with the Virgin Mary in a mountain in Salta, and people from all across the country go to see her.

So, to refer to messages from God as "hallucinations" is offensive to my religion. Agustinaldo (talk) 14:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)agustinaldo[reply]

If this is a word used in the movie to describe what he sees, then this is just describing the movie, as it should. If this word (or variation) isn't used, then the article should be edited accordingly. — Val42 (talk) 04:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, "hallucinations" has been used in some reviews, but in the context of the movie "vision" is a better description, I think. -- Arwel (talk) 11:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the scence where Damian meets his mother, he says "I know your are a dream, but thats OK". Suggesting that the visions are not "real". In any case the word vision is better as it is neutral and doesn't suggest either way whether the saints and his mother are real or not.194.200.145.5 (talk) 10:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is also the Nativity scene where one of the Saints speaks Damian's line as Damian has run away to escape the robber, which suggests they aren't visions as the audience (in the film) react to the line being spoken. Gavinturner (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Themes" section[edit]

I propose to scrap the entire "Themes" section; all of it is either repetition of material presented in the plot summary, or else could be incorporated into the plot summary, or else is original research:

Damian, after trying to help people with it, chooses to burn it because he realises that the money has caused all sorts of problems, and most importantly that it was stolen in the first place and that it would be wrong to keep it for personal gain.
The switchover from the pound sterling to the euro is fictional, as in real life the United Kingdom still uses the pound.

This is redundant, and has already been stated in the plot summary.

The movie is a commentary on the issue of world poverty; particularly in Africa; as well as the spiritual poverty of affluence.
this film poses the age-old question of what one would do if they suddenly received a large windfall

This is original research.

In the final scene we see Damian's dream of the family flying a rocket ship to Africa and helping develop water wells, which earlier in the movie is shown to be the most crucial and cheapest way to drastically improve the quality of life for many African communities.

This should just be moved to the end of the plot summary, IMO.

The only thing left is the tagline, "Can anyone be truly good?" Seems this could either be moved somewhere else or removed.

If no one objects by tomorrow, I'll go ahead and make these changes. --NetherlandishYankee (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ending[edit]

Can somebody explain to me why the movie apparently ends with an improvised carboard trip to africa? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.132.24 (talk) 06:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, the world that existed before the climax is completely different from the one after. (Remember the stark difference between the scene at the train tracks and the bright, beautiful cheery next day?) Hounded by uncertainty throughout the film, Damian finds a truth, makes a stand, and his dreams live on undefeated.
http://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/films/films.php?id=9631 <-- A pretty good review focusing on the nature of miracles. Combine it with Ebert's quote:
"The closing sequence is a bit of a stretcher, I will be the first to admit, but why not go for broke? One of the tests of sainthood is the performance of a miracle, and since Damian is clearly on the road to sainthood, that is permitted him." Vordabois (talk) 07:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The use in money, etc.[edit]

The term millions in plural form is often referred to in money, amount of people etc. So I added a dabnote, which I'm surprised about since it hasn't been there for all those years. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damian's age[edit]

There have been several attempts to edit Damian's age in this article to 9 or 10. The back of the region 2 DVD makes it perfectly plain that Damian's character in the movie is seven years old, and this also appeared in numerous reviews of the movie at the time it was released. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Millions (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Millions (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Millions_(2004_film)&oldid=1195363900"