Talk:Mieczysław Weinberg/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Numbering

Just a note that Manashir Yakubov's notes to the Claves Chamber Symphonies disc mentions 19 quartets rather than 17. Mark1 21:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

More numerical oddness- Grove gives his date of death as 2 Feb, not 26. Mark1 20:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Hrm. Looking at Gregorian calendar to see whether this was a matter of Old Style/New Style dating makes me very, very confused but suggests not, that Poland was in fact among the first countries to adopt the new system (along with Lithuania in commonwealth). As to quartets, I am guessing that if it is not simply an error, it results from counting the two versions of the first quartet separately, and perhaps the opus 9 Aria as well (just as some composers' named but un-numbered works are also counted - inconsistently! - by some reference sources...) (And I wonder about the opus 129/130 question noted at this Weinberg worklist... but then, sources can't agree on how many symphonies he composed either. Apparently no. 20 exists in reconstructable form, but I can't see why numbers greater than 20 show up from time to time unless the sinfoniettas and chamber symphonies are being counted etc.) Schissel-nonLop! 05:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Russian names

To Galassi:

Speculations of an "anti-semitic" boarder officer "forcing" Weinberg to accept the name "Moyshey" and a patronymic "Samuilovich" are utterly judgmental, unproved and above all quite ludicrous. I don't know what is exactly the principle you go on in reverting to this uninformed statement all the time. 1. Samuilovich is Weinberg's natural patronymic, based - as all Russian patronymics are - on his father's first name. His father's name was Shmil/Shmuel, which is in Russian Samuil (he had actually been once a Russian citizen), hence Samuilovich. Absolutely every single person in the Soviet Union had a patronymic in his/her passport. This had nothing to do with anyone being "anti-semitic" or otherwise malicious. It would be bizarre if Weinberg was forced to take any other patronymic, say "Petrovich" or "Vasilievich". 2. As every person of Jewish descent, Weinberg had an original Jewish name. Do you suggest his given Jewish name was Mieczysław? In his case this name was "Moishe". He was known by this name in the Yiddish theater, where he was engaged from his childhood on. He used this very name in his articles in the Soviet Yiddish-language magazine Sovetish Heymland. As his Polish name, Weinberg used Mieczysław; as his Russian name he used Moisey (not Moyshey - as you keep on insisting). Perhaps, you have a written proof that the boarder officer was anti-semitic and had a malicious intent in giving Weinberg his very own birth name, but this is simply ludicrous. Weinberg was for the rest of his life known by this name, Moisey, and never attempted to change it to anything else. --SimulacrumDP 20:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

FYI: as Polish citizen MV had no patronymic, and there is no evidence he ever had a Yiddish name given to him at birth. He received both in 1939, MoiSHei under these specific bordercrossing circumstances, as stated by Per Scans in the liner notes to MV's Chandos CD. So we are expecting you to reinsert the paragagph appropriatelyGalassi 22:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

He immigrated into the Soviet Union, on his own will (regardless of difficult circumstances): do you suggest he was supposed to become Soviet citizen without getting a mandatory traditional patronymic there? This is absurd: every Soviet citizen had a patronymic and he became a Soviet citizen and chose to stay in the Soviet Union when after the War former Polish citizens had an opportunity to return to Poland. If you, for one, met him and spoke to him in Russian, you would be forced to call him Moisey Samuilovich, because not using a patronymic is rude, irreverent and impolite in that language!!! As to evidence, it's quite the opposite: there is no evidence that he didn't receive a Jewish (it's Hebrew, BTW, not Yiddish) name at birth, for not receiving it would be extremely out of ordinary! Moreover, unheard of in Poland! As to the Yiddish - yes, that was his native language, he worked in the Yiddish theater and married into the family of the greatest-ever Soviet star of the Yiddish theater, one Shloyme Mikhoels. And yes, he published in Sovetish Heymland in Yiddish under the name "Moyshe" (no anti-Semitic member of the editorial board of this Yiddish-language magazine forced him to sign with this name). Moreover, there is no MoiShei in the Russian language: his name was Moisey (Моисей). Shostakovich called him Моисей Самуилович (Moisey Samuilovich), Sviridov did the same[1]. And finally, it is highly doubtful that he ever crossed any border at all! A great number of Polish Jews, running away from the worsening situation, simply went into the Polish territory that was getting unnexed by the Soviet Union and then became part of the Soviet Belorussia and Ukraine. Just hold back for a jiffy and think about a patronymic being forced onto a naturalized Soviet citizen! --SimulacrumDP 01:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Consult Russian Wiki.Galassi 02:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Common, this is childish. You may add whatever until it's removed. It's not just a game, there has never been such a name Moishey - it's an English misspelling of two names together: Moishe and Moisey; simply got perpetuated. Moisey Samuilovich Vaynberg features in several hundred Russian-language sites! Don't get it personal, but by this kind of action you go against historicity and show disrespect for the composer. Let's just end this, I wrote a neutral passage, which simply avoids labels like "anti-Semitic" and other unproved notions...--SimulacrumDP 02:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Biography

In answer to my own thought above about the non-appearance of the Per Skans biography, it turns out that he died in January before finishing it. The book is now unlikely to appear before 2009. [2] HenryFlower 16:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Kishinev Pogrom and Weinberg

Does anyone know where does this information about Weinberg's grandfather and greatgrandfather having been murdered during the Kishinev Pogrom come from? Here's the list of the Pogrom's victims: Victims list, there are 46 victims here, true - some resources mention 49 victims, still - there's no one by the name "Vaynberg" in the list and there's only one combination of two males with the same surnames: Krupnik. It strongly appears that this information isn't reliable, the family may have suffered in the Pogrom, lost property, but no murders... --SimulacrumDP 01:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

The sleevenotes to volume 2 of the Chandos symphonies mention that "some members of his family" were killed then. The notes are by Per Skans, who was the authority on Weinberg, so I'll change the article to reflect what we do know. Incidentally, his maternal relatives are unlikely to have been called Weinberg, so looking for that name only covers half the options. :) HenryFlower 17:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Musical style

Galassi, a couple of points to bear in mind:

- the distinction between programmatic and absolute music has nothing to to with the influence of folk elements; they're completely separate issues. So even if you're right on the absolute music issue, that's no reason to remove reference to folk elements.

- the distinction between programmatic and absolute music is a matter of degree, not of either/or. Saying that his music has 'qualities of the absolute' means only that it's not completely programmatic, which one could also say about pretty much every composer who ever lived. It's not a distinguishing feature. If that's the best account that Grove can come up with (I don't have it to hand), it's an uncharacteristic moment of muddle; could you tell us exactly what it says? I can't make head or tail of "– quality" - what is that meant to mean? That the music has some (unspecified) qualities? That it's of good quality? Whatever you want to say, that needs to be phrased better. HenryFlower 09:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

There are a few fallacies and misperceptions in that passage, which I would try to correct in the Grove's style. BTW, MW had no exposure to Klezmer (which is an American phenomenon, and has little in common with Jewish folk music). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galassi (talkcontribs) 13:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You're right that klezmer wasn't the best article to link to - at the time this section was written the Jewish music article didn't exist. I've fixed that now. (Incidentally your conception of klezmer music is very different from any I've come across before, and very different from our article's, but that's a question for another time). HenryFlower 08:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The Grove passage, which I've tracked down, isn't really very illuminating on the programmatic/absolute issue, basically saying that his works contain both programmatic and absolute elements:

"his works are often based on a programme, largely autobiographical in nature, and they reflect on the fate of the composer and of humanity in general. ... The imagery of many of his works is connected with his memories of his childhood and of World War II, and consequently themes relating to the destruction of childhood (and, by extension, purity, serenity and stability) are central to his aesthetic and are frequently symbolized by the musical material. Despite this, Weinberg strove for a reflection of a philosophy of universal harmony and unity by means of neo-classical, rationalist clarity and proportion. For all the importance of the word, the programmatical nature of many works and the occasional Slavic and Jewish thematic materials, his music has an absolute – even abstract – quality, with similar themes able to assume varied semantic hues in given environments."

The one point there that might be worth mentioning is the idea of transformation of elements, in the mention of 'symbolization' and 'varied semantic hues'; a straight quotation would probably be better than trying to paraphrase. HenryFlower 09:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Teachers

Tassie's book on Myaskovsky mentions several points at which Weinberg brought compositions (of his) to Myaskovsky for perusal and (at least in the Google-preview portions I've read; I intend to borrow the whole book soon of course) seems to imply Weinberg was a pupil of his. Is this the case? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Date of birth

I don't know how to reconcile this, or note the discrepancy according to Wikipedia editing protocol, but the lead paragraph gives his date of birth as December 8, 1919; the section "Life" gives it as January 12, 1919. Frank Lynch (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. The sources linked from the article all seem to give 8 December, so I've changed the second occurrence to that. --Deskford (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

The Golden Key

is this ballet by Weinberg based on Aleksey Tolstoy's (itself Pinocchio-inspired) "The Golden Key, or the Adventures of Buratino"? Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes, according to http://www.classical.net/music/recs/reviews/o/oly00473a.php Frank Lynch (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mieczysław Weinberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Conversion and baptism

Editor @Elliskirsch: recently added useful perspective on the claimed conversion/baptism of Weinberg, based on what looks like a seemingly reliable interview with the composer's daughter Victoria Weinberg by German pianist Elizaveta Blumina. However, from my reading in auto-translation, the claim that the baptism was "forced" seems like an exaggeration. As VW is clearly agreeing with the more direct testimony of her (un-named?) half-sister, I have characterised this as something she "believes" rather than "claims". I will of course defer to a better translation if I have got it wrong. Davidships (talk) 23:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Grove

For some time there have been several references to "Grove" as a source, but the citation is missing which edition, article author etc. Can someone who has this please redo the cites? Davidships (talk) 11:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)