Talk:Michael (archangel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit notice[edit]

This edit notice has been present since 2011. May I suggest that it has served its purpose and can now be removed? Sojourner in the earth (talk) 20:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I second this motion. Eruditess (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revelation of Jesus Christ[edit]

Please correct where it's written "Revelation of John" under "New Testament" to Revelation of Jesus Christ as it is the way written in the scripture Rev.1:1 The book is the revelation of Jesus Christ, NOT John 2601:14D:4B80:4960:101:CE2A:EE48:EA61 (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to "Book of Revelation". Sojourner in the earth (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
marking as  Done Eruditess (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly 2604:2D80:9E90:D00:8078:30EA:DBCB:FA10 (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural[edit]

I just wanted to add in the TV show Supernatural the Archangel Michael appears for several episodes. Anyone want to add? Lady Meg (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Meg: no, that's trivia. You'd need a third-party source that discusses why it is notable and significant to the subject of this article. Skyerise (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus regarding the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament[edit]

In the New Testament section, references 14, 21 and 22 all cite the "Satan" section of the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, pages 156-157. The text with those sources in the article gives a certain narrative that perked my ears as possibly not reflecting academic consensus. They are:

  • That Revelation 12 indicates that "The fall of Satan at the coming of Jesus marks the separation of the New Testament from Judaism"
  • That Luke 22:31 indicates that Jesus "…thus takes on the role played by angels, and especially Michael, in Judaism"

In the first point, Revelation 12/13 never indicates a separation from Judaism. In the second, Luke 22 never indicates that Jesus is taking on a role from Michael, and in fact never mentions Michael at all.

I could be completely off-base, and I don't want to start slapping tags on the article without a discussion. What are others' thoughts on either the source or its characterization in the article? AnandaBliss (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]