Talk:Megan Nicole

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 18, 2011	Candidate for speedy deletion	Deleted
June 27, 2011	Candidate for speedy deletion	Deleted
May 11, 2012	Candidate for speedy deletion	Deleted
August 23, 2012	Candidate for speedy deletion	Deleted
October 5, 2012	Articles for deletion	Deleted
October 27, 2012	Articles for deletion	Deleted
July 15, 2014	Deletion review	Relisted
July 22, 2014	Articles for deletion	Kept

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Notability[edit]

I will say to start that I am a fan of Megan Nicole, am subscribed to her YouTube channel, and like her music (both covers and original material). The sources provided from the Houston Chronicle and The Straits Times in Singapore present more than just a mere mention of her, and may be significant enough to establish, if only barely, some level of notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines, per WP:GNG. I'm discounting the ones from VIBE Vixen and The News Tribune, as neither add significant coverage, and the latter appears to be only for promoting/advertising her. As Cunard says in the appeal page, those last two sources are "supplemental" to the other sources.

Regarding her notability in her profession, which must follow WP:MUSICBIO, I am very skeptical about the article standing on that merit. She has been signed to Bad Boy Records for almost two years, and there has been word for a while about her releasing a debut album, but no delivery. This deals a serious blow to her being notable as a musician, as she also has not had her already released music on any chart in Billboard. (Please note, I do not count the "Social 50" chart in establishing notability in WP:MUSICBIO, as that is a measure of her popularity as a musician among social media sites; it only provides an indirect measure of the popularity of her music.) Her public exposure seems to be limited to the Internet, with no known appearances on national TV talk/news programs (please provide me with footage on that if I'm wrong), which could boost her being notable. Still, having more sources around that establish her notability under the general guidelines is better than what Wikipedia has seen about her.

If this article is not allowed to stand, someone suggested from the AfD discussion about placing Megan in the List of YouTube personalities, where Megan right now is not listed. And I would endorse that, particularly on account of the two sources I mentioned above that establish her notability.

MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Nicole (2nd nomination) was closed as keep after agreement that Megan Nicole passes WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Cunard (talk) 05:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Native name?[edit]

I have seen the following edits recently: [1] [2] [3]. I needed to find out the description of this infobox entry, and it says in the template instructions: "This field is only relevant for individuals. The artist's name in their own language." Two of those edits specified her apparent name in Indonesian, which goes against the instructions regarding language, and is also unsourced. As the instructions on the usage of the attribute (native_name) are otherwise unclear, I don't find it necessary to use — unless someone could shed some better light on the appropriate use of native name — so please refrain from using this attribute. And as this is a WP:BLP article, any such addition needs to be reliably sourced. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your reverts of this unsourced information here. And that the additions are against the template instructions also indicates that this should not be added even if reliable sources were found. Cunard (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Megan Nicole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://docs.newsbank.com/s/InfoWeb/aggdocs/AWNB/14A106FC1CC69B90/0D7C12F5A8A2A86A
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016111830/http://www.fanlala.com/news/megan-nicole-releases-electrified-and-its-lyric-video to http://www.fanlala.com/news/megan-nicole-releases-electrified-and-its-lyric-video

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]