Talk:Mary Brazier

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photo[edit]

Photo: The NHI has a photo of her here (http://nhi.sen.es/index.php/categories/portraits/aso000042). Unsure if it is public domain or not. Quine (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Quine: Unfortunately, looks like not: the site's copyright statement says no non-commercial use. Thanks for checking, though; and thanks for this important new article! Opabinia regalis (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EEG details[edit]

I am neither a physician nor a behavioral scientist. Any help on the technical details of her contributions to computerized analysis of EEGs would be greatly appreciated. There is a lot in both the Barlow and the Parlee which explains it, but it is beyond me. Quine (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]