Talk:Marian Ciepielowski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Buchenwald prisoner Dr. Marian Ciepielowski produced fake typhus vaccine for Nazi soldiers, while saving the real vaccine for his fellow prisoners? Source: "The sabotage consisted in the fact that instead of the vaccine we were supposed to produce... we produced 600 litres of water slightly stained with blood and seasoned with formalin for the SS combat units, while 7 litres of the real vaccine of our own production, which turned out to be better than Weigel’s, was used to vaccinate ourselves and other Buchenwald prisoners." Klodzinski, S. Sabotage at the Buchenwald SS Hygiene Institute. Dr Marian Ciepielowski. Baluk-Ulewiczowa, T., trans. Medical Review – Auschwitz. January 17, 2020. https://www.mp.pl/auschwitz. Originally published as “Sabotaz w buchenwaldzkim Instytucie Higieny SS. Dr Marian Ciepielowski” Przeglad Lekarski – Oswiecim. 1977: 141–145
    • ALT1:... that Dr. Marian Ciepielowski, while imprisoned at Buchenwald concentration camp, wrote fake research papers on typhus to be published under the name of a Nazi officer? Source: "Dr. Marian Ciepielowski and I, in solemn contempt for Nazi science, wrote half a dozen medical papers on typhus that Dr. Ding-Schuler published under his name..." Kogon, Eugen, "The Theory and Practice of Hell", pg. 142

Created by PohranicniStraze (talk). Self-nominated at 17:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Very intriguing hook for pandemic times. No QPQ is needed for you as this is your first nomination. Long enouhh, neutral article with no citation issues. Created 2 days ago. Hook is within 200 characters. Sounds good to go! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trillfendi (talkcontribs) 20:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Glad to see this here. I recommended to the author to nominate this and I also concur it meets DYK criteria. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, and filled out the references. Please provide a page number for footnote 3. Yoninah (talk) 20:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoninah: Found the page # and added. Thanks for your help! PohranicniStraze (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Restoring tick per Trillfendi's review. Yoninah (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]