Talk:Manga iconography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not only not Verifiable, it's wrong[edit]

"A red cheek denotes embarrassment or blushing."

1. Back in the Manga article, it says that manga is usually printed in black & white. And so it is, and has been for a long time in Japan, and, more recently, in the United States and Europe. So how do we have a RED cheek?

2. "Red" cheeks are often depicted by cross-hatching, shading, or the use of screen tones. They MIGHT denote embarassment or blushing but they can also denote sexual arousal or fury.

I think I might tackle more of this page as time permits. For example, there are NO citations for anything at all.

Timothy Perper 20:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I sounded peeved up there, but this is the kind of careless writing that I truly don't like... Timothy Perper 23:32, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge sweat drop into Manga iconography. Article face fault was deleted. -- David Bailey (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merge of face fault and sweat drop into this article. KyuuA4 (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge sweatdrop in there. Face Fault is fine as it is, and is very informative. ZeroGiga (Contact) 16:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I think both face fault and sweat drop should be merged into this article. The manga visual style needs to be discussed as a whole, not as separate entities. Many illustrators will use multiple sets of visual clues (icons) when drawing scenes, even on the same panel (see Genshiken and Love Hina manga as examples). David Bailey (talk) 11:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, Face Fault has recently been deleted, as the consensus was it was mostly original unreferenced research. Only sweat drop now remains and this could easily be merged into this article. David Bailey (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

USA-centric[edit]

How is the article USA-centric? It deals with another comics culture? 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 15:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't, so I've removed this flag. David Bailey (talk) 13:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References and citations[edit]

We need to find examples from one or more manga comic-strip(s) to use for each item listed on the page. They should be correctly referenced as per the {cite book} template. David Bailey (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facial Features[edit]

"Osamu Tezuka started drawing them in this way in his manga Astro Boy, which led to the style of Disney and Betty Boop cartoons from the United States."

Shouldn't this read "which was inspired by the style of Disney"? Both Disney and Betty Boop were around long before Osamu Tezuka made Astro Boy.

Alexanderkominek (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

FYI: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378216615003318 (If nobody else ends up using this to shore up this very under-referenced article, I will at some point.) Sandtalon (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hair Color Section[edit]

Should this section be removed? Not only is it about anime (rather than manga), but the one source the section uses seems extremely under researched. I tried searching for some better sources, but everything I have read has different interpretations regarding the "symbolism" of hair color in anime. Gretabird (talk) 21:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]