Talk:MISFET

Is there a compelling reason this cannot be merged with and redirected to MOSFET. In practice the term MOSFET seems to be used even in cases where it is technically a MISFET. TStein (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes. MISFETs are new, emerging technolgies, hence the new term for new things. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Since MOSFETs are a subset of MISFETs. it is not a new class, although there may be new instances of the class being developed. SpinningSpark 19:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Can any one tell what is the advantage of MISFET over MOSFET

Merged. Citations in some books go back to the '80s - if this term hasn't become predominant in the last 30 years, it's not going to. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Reverted. A redirect to a completely unexplained "MOSFET" is thoroughly unhelpful. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)