Talk:MI-6 (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Xiaomi#Mi Series|Xiaomi]] The anchor (#Mi Series) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MI-6 → MI-6 (disambiguation)

– I may be doing this completely wrong, as it's a bit confusing; I was thinking about copying and pasting to switch the articles, but that doesn't seem appropriate. Point is, I'd like MI-6 (disambiguation) to be the proper dab page and have MI-6 redirect to Secret Intelligence Service on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC grounds. Last month, SIS got 53,628 visits compared to 10,917 for all other topics listed here combined. MI6 already redirects there, so I'd replace the current hatnote with Template:Redirect4 to cover both forms. -- BDD (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment we could move it to mi-6, since that's a different name. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 03:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clearly the primary topic and actually a far commoner name for the organisation than the SIS. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Mil Mi-6 shouldn't even count. Marcus Qwertyus 11:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I fail to see why the Mi-6 helicopter wouldn't count. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 15:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support exactly per nom. bd2412 T 18:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.