Talk:Lucille Ball/GA1

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article is missing some footnotes. This could be remedied, or else it may put its GA status at risk. Anything else I'm missing? --George Ho (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been altered a great deal since I took it to a WP:GA status. There have been many additions to the article that I feel are not appropriate or even relevant. I do think its time for the article to be reassessed to bring it back up to the standards it was at when I was continually working on it. I would suggest that one looks first at all of the dead links or non reliable sources. I believe some of the sentence structuring has been compromised from its original formatting simply because of the amount of contribution to the page. I do not feel it will take much to get the article back into GA condition, but I do agree it needs to be done! --Canyouhearmenow 10:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to have been abandoned by the nominator so I will close it. ~~No real reason concerning the GA criteria has been given for delisting so I will close it as keep.~~ AIRcorn (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relooking at this I jumped the gun. there are too many unreferenced paragraphs and tags on this article for it to be considered Good. Retroactively changing the close to Delist. AIRcorn (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]