Talk:Lord Edgware Dies

Novels: Crime Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Lord Edgware Dies.jpg[edit]

Image:Lord Edgware Dies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TV adaptation[edit]

I have reversed the change which deleted the information regarding the TV adaptation. A section on "TV, Film and Theatrical adaptations" is a legitimate section under the wikiproject novels task (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels/ArticleTemplate) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtomlin1uk (talk • contribs) 07:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

page torn from letter[edit]

The summary of the plot states that it was the second page of the letter which had a corner torn off of it, but my version of the novel (albeit the US version) says that an entire page of the letter was missing, meaning that the page with the torn corner must have been the third or subsequent page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.82.254 (talk) 03:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An entire page plus the corner with a single letter, but Poirot discovers the two "doctorings" at different times in the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.149.175 (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lord Edgware Dies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the archived pages, same as original. --Prairieplant (talk) 04:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of disbelief[edit]

The book is very skillfully written, but it really stretches suspension of disbelief to (or beyond) breaking point - especially when the schemes and identity of the killer become clear at the end. :) 195.67.149.175 (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]