Talk:Liverpool railway station, Sydney

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Liverpool railway station, Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Other transport links[edit]

Having reviewed the policy sections WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTTRAVEL, the inclusion of cited transport links does not appear in breach. A high level listing of other transport links with no mention of times, frequencies or days of operation is a long way short of replicating a timetable.

If an editor does feel it is breach, can the relevant section/sections of policy please be quoted. Mo7838 (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As requested, a quote "When you wonder what should or should not be in an article, ask yourself what a reader would expect to find under the same heading in an encyclopedia."SovalValtos (talk) 19:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which in this case would definitely be "YES" Fleet Lists (talk) 21:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. The very fact we have a policy called NOTTRAVEL should be telling you something. Even Wikivoyage, our specialist travel wiki, does not list individual bus routes. It just gives links to the operators' websites, which is the most we do on Wikipedia, but with internal links to the operators. Asking for chapter and verse, or saying something is exempt because it is not specifically mentioned is wikilawyering. WP:NOT is policy which must be followed. It trumps any discussion on a talkpage. The guideline WP:PROSE and essay on recentism also have a bearing here.

I will be removing the unencyclopedic list again shortly in line with policy. If it is put back I will go to the admins to ask for sanctions against any editor who persists in editing against policy. That could mean a topic ban or a complete block on editing.Charles (talk) 21:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ema.gov.au/ema/emadisasters.nsf/54273a46a9c753b3ca256d0900180220/62c09a021342f308ca256d3300058214?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liverpool railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]