Talk:Live at Donington (Iron Maiden album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ironmaidendoningtonrevised.jpg

Image:Ironmaidendoningtonrevised.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg

Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg

Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg

Image:Live-At-Donnington.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Track durations

The track durations I have provided are the most accurate, they qere produced using EAC copy and medievakl cue splitter with option to preserve pregaps hidden in INDEX 00 of the cue sheet, this is the result:

http://s1307.photobucket.com/user/SFtheGreat/media/Donington_zpsb00d7811.png.html

83.13.239.255 (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I have investigated thoroughly and what you have done is appended the gaps to the following track, causing a change in lengths. If you had set it to the default position (appended to the previous track), you would have ended up with the correct track lengths, which are identical to non-EAC. What you have done, in essence, is move where each track ends on the CD to the non-default, and therefore incorrect, place.--Nerdtrap (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Actually appending to next track IS correct, as you can see in cue sheet, pregap is located in INDEX 00 of the track, so this is integral part of that track, not previous track. I have already written to EAC and explained this issue, this may surprise you, but they are working on fixing it.

This is how pregaps appear in cue sheet:

    TRACK 05
    INDEX 00 15:60,563
    INDEX 01 19:34,143

If the pregaps were supposed to be part of previous track by red standard, they would be INDEX 02 of the previous track, and read the name itself "PREgap", not "POSTgap", which means that this is a prelude to the track, not outrodction from previous track. Furthermore in many cases the pregap hides intro to the songs, which placed at end pf previous track after it's fade-out has no sense, a perfect example of this is Jennie Teb;er's Out of Oblivion album, half of the tracks has those intros which directly goes into track with no pause, so putting them at ends would result in those songs starting abruptly without their intros, the same is with live recordings, notable example is Deep Purple, like all of their live albusm contain lengthy pregaps with spoken song introductions, warm-ups and jams that lead to the next track, NOT as lead-out from previous. Check Amon Amarth's Surtur Rising, last track has 1:43 intro in pregap, that if ripped correctly (my way) is a proper intro of 10th track, or Mayhem's Declaration of Work, 1st track has 2:40 minute pregap, if ripped with pregaps appended to previous track, this intro is lost because it cannot be appended to previous track, because there is no previous track and this intro is placed like this in cue:

    TRACK 01
    INDEX 00 00:00,000
    INDEX 01 02:42,000

PREgap, not POSTgap, much like preludion and postludiom.

83.13.239.255 (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)