Talk:List of political magazines

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of published publications is outdated[edit]

Dissent (Australian) is no longer published as of 2014, as outlined in it's own article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11893945AA (talk • contribs) 13:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Polish political alignments are wrong...[edit]

Political alignments for the polish newspapers are wrong. For example Krytyka Polityczna wouldn't consider themselves communists, nor it would be considered a communist newspaper by the communists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.218.236.111 (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orientation? Political "hue"?[edit]

...it would be great to add where on the spectrum (or outside of it, if so) these pubs fall... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.22.193 (talk) 22:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputing Political Alignments[edit]

Several of the magazines seem to have inaccurate descriptions. World Affairs magazine is Conservative? It's published by the pacifist American Peace Society. Commentary Magazine is listed as "liberal (formerly) conservative." That is very unclear. Is it saying that the magazine is liberal, and (formerly) conservative; or that the magazine was liberal (formerly), and is conservative. Newsweek's conservatism is also a subject of contention. TheBlaze is certainly not libertarian, and I think many would put it in the neoconservative camp. Soulsrocker (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On that topic, I changed the political alignment of HP/de Tijd to moderate, since it is an independent magazine that could be considered progressive liberal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.52.24.50 (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neoliberal[edit]

It would be great if this article made a distinction between liberal and neoliberal, especially regarding magazines that discuss anything related to economics. 68.228.43.199 (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)ian f.[reply]