Talk:List of Old Harrovians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reconstruction in Process!!![edit]

Hi, I'm rearanging the current list to mke it more sucsinct, adding over 400 as yet unadded alumni in the process and ...afterwards....putting it all in alphabetical order. I would appreciate a reduction in any editing of this page until finnished. This will take around 2 weeks, but will be worth it!, thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.199.173 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning up the list[edit]

I am returning this list to alphabetical order. If some future editor wishes to group the names in another way, it would be most helpful to include headers (e.g., British Prime Ministers and Statesment, Scientists, etc.). I am also providing a one- or two-word description of notability for individuals without titles, and added commas between the names and the descriptors. Risker 04:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the cleanup tag was added to this article in the midst of completing the above-noted cleanup. The tag was added by an Anon. Would whoever added the tag please identify what they consider to be in need of cleanup? Risker 16:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A possible reason is the two lines:
Seven Harrovians have held the position of British Prime Minister.
Nineteen Harrovians were awarded the Victoria Cross.
Who were they exactly? -- Slumgum | yap | stalk | 21:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I see. Well, perhaps the most straightforward solution is to remove these two sentences. The British Prime Ministers are identified as such already in the list. While the Harrow website states that 19 of its alumni were awarded the Victoria Cross, there is no list of who these individuals are, so best to leave it out. Risker 02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Barbie???Pipester 21:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill[edit]

I suggest that Sir Winston Churchill will be mentioned twice. Both as prime minister and as writer. If he isn't considered to be a writer - the opposite could be argued with his Nobel prize in Literature in mind. Victor b04 (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think that's fair enough. He should be added just after the poet Byron. Xn4 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobility section[edit]

Harrow has produced hundreds of aristocrats, most of whom are more notable for doing other things than merely having inherited titles. I suggest that if someone is notable for another reason, that we enter them under the relevant section, and if we still have nobles who have actually achieved little else but inheritence of a title, then we can move them to an "Other" section below.--Zoso Jade (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Old Harrovians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]