Talk:List of Iowa townships

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

United States: Iowa

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Mid-importance).

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

For a good hour I have been trying to edit the page to add another section, and edit the current.

This list is great, but (according to research I have seen) Rockingham Township, Iowa is a *former* Township and I would like to:

Add a note above the current list to reflect that everything thus-far on the page is a list of current Townships.
Add a section below this one that will allow for an alphabetical listing like the one there, for former Townships.
Add a "Contents" box that will take you to the list as it is, and the new list (I thought I had it down, by adding the equals signs, but nothing works).

I know my ramblings here may be hard to understand, but I hope some questions from people reading this may clarify some of it. --(talk) 20:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]