Talk:Liquid Audio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contesting speedy deletion[edit]

Er, as the article says, Liquid Audio was the number 2 standard for Internet audio in the late 1990s (behind RealPlayer). The battle between it and RealPlayer for control of the emerging digital market was of great importance at the time. Like, almost as important to the music industry as, say, MP3.com or Napster were a little later (remember them?)

There are 68,900 Google references to Liquid Audio. It was also a US public company - which in itself is more than sufficient reason for there to be a Wikipedia article! Ben Finn (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liquid Audio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]