Talk:LibLime

Untitled

This page reads like a sales brochure - at a minimum it needs to be shortened greatly, to just notable facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.1.165 (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

It reads as if written by staff at liblime themselves, which is not suitable source for a wikipedia article. Review by neutral person needed. Tanifa (talk) 02:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

It's even worse now, there is blatantly wrong information about patents, trademarks etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.240.7 (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

It is getting consistently more sales brochure like as staff from PTFS edit the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranginui (talk • contribs) 22:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Five of the citations link to press releases on liblime's own site, should we remove these? 22:46, 31 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranginui (talk • contribs)

Apparent conflict of interest

Jkostoff (talk · contribs) appears to an executive at PTFS [1] [2], if this is right he has an undeclared conflict of interest. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Koha (software) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 00:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Defense contractor?

Is there any particular reason why PTFS is referred to as a defense contractor? What bearing do their other customers have in this context? According to their website, they also contract out to various private and public universities, libraries, and organizations. Do we refer to Microsoft as a defense contractor? Oracle? Google? Jbmcb (talk) 00:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure Microsoft, Oracle and Google do this, but PTFS (of which liblime are a division of not their own company for a start). From the PTFS website "PTFS’s Professional Support Services department specializes in staffing for Intelligence Agencies. We focus on providing cleared staff and operations personnel to manage declassification and FOIA initiatives. Our qualified contract staff provides proven FOIA and declassification accuracy and efficiency." So I think that is were it comes from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.214.51 (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LibLime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054551/http://blog.libraryjournal.com/tennantdigitallibraries/2009/09/15/liblime-to-the-koha-community-fork-you to http://blog.libraryjournal.com/tennantdigitallibraries/2009/09/15/liblime-to-the-koha-community-fork-you/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LibLime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607110431/http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6714841.html to http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6714841.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)