Talk:LexisNexis/Archives/2021

Challenging bizarre edits by User:Pi314m on 3 December 2020

The edits are so awful it looks like User:Pi314m is trying to deliberately vandalize the article. What is "LexBourne"?! I am going to revert them in a week or so unless I see some good reasons fast. --Coolcaesar (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

A comment I have from that edit reads:

"Quite a few re-uses of Bourne book. Combined into ONE, plus {{rp|p.xxx}}

does that explain the goal of the edit? Pi314m (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Not really. Plus you actually made the references to that cited work harder to use.

You're not related to any healthcare providers, are you? The first thing everyone learns in health care is Primum non nocere. --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, you still haven't explained what is LexBourne. The burden is on the editor making changes to the longstanding consensus version of the article to explain their edits. --Coolcaesar (talk) 02:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

I still don't see any explanation. I am going to proceed with reverting User:Pi314m's edits, which appear to be deliberate vandalism of the article. If you've got a grudge against LexisNexis, take it up directly with the company. Vandalizing their article on Wikipedia with garbage edits is a clear violation of WP:NOT and grounds for a permanent block. --Coolcaesar (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)