Talk:Levitation (Hawkwind album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Levitation (Hawkwind album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Progressive Rock

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Fair use rationale for Image:Hawkwind-levitation.jpg[edit]

Image:Hawkwind-levitation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Full gig?[edit]

According to the listing for this gig on the Starfarer website, what Atomhenge has listed for the forthcoming release is incomplete. Curiously, "Master of the Universe" is not listed, even though it has previously been released as the B-side to "Motorway City" and on the Hawkwind Anthology. Very curiously, Atomhenge are also stating that Michael Moorcock is on these recordings, which all the reports I've previously seen contradict, which makes me wonder whether some of these recordings are the studio recordings from Zones (album)? Drwhawkfan (talk) 10:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've paid Atomhenge direct (although pre-order at Play was cheaper I found out later) so a week or so time we'll have the answer!--C Hawke (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My version arrived this morning, I had a quick listen and read of the notes. Moorcock is listed as vocals on just one track Running Through the Back Brain (Messages)" and the notes, written by Brian Tawn, state he guested at two concerts on the tour (so not just a tape or phone call), this being one of them, a quick listed to the track and it sounds live, but I can't say who is singing. But given the source of the notes and the band's involvement, I'd say other sources were wrong. --C Hawke (talk) 08:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems obvious that 1. this isn't the full concert (even Brainstorm is edited), and 2. the "live" versions of some of the tracks are the studio versions from Zones. Fair enough, but I wish Atomhenge would be a little more honest about these things. See starfarer. - Drwhawkfan (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Levitation (Hawkwind album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C:

Y All the start class criteria
N A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B:

N All the C class criteria
N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
? No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
? No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS

Requires cover art to move into C-class — Drwhawkfan (talk) 11:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 21:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Levitation (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]