Talk:Leroy Jethro Gibbs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cleanup[edit]

I'm not sure why this article was marked for cleanup. Anybody think it could it be removed now? Splamo 01:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There were no sections when it was added. I agree, it should be removed. --DavidHOzAu 04:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete[edit]

Don't delete this page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tolnedra (talkcontribs) 14:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC) I don't think this page should be deleted or any other main character pages because if somebody hasn't really seen much of the show, then they research them on here. To be honest, when I started to watch NCIS, I looked on here and I still do! Please don't delete it![reply]

what's he drink?[edit]

Several episodes refer to Gibb's drinking habits, but I can't find any reference within the article, and can't for the life of me remember what it was. AnarchyElmo (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as alcohol, he drinks bourbon.

In an episode, he handled a small metalic flask with the names of his deceased partner and daughter. According to Episode Seven of Season Six, he ordered a bourbon.

Specifically, he drinks Maker's Mark Bourbon. I forget the specific episodes, but the bottle appears several times, and it's got a rather notable look to it. I suppose the other question, then, is which beer? In "Tribes" you get a fair look at the bottle, but I couldn't tell which type it is. Duffterrall (talk) 23:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Season 16 episode 24 Gibbs takes a bottle of Glen Edinburgh out of a drawer to pack for Fornell.

Three wives or four?[edit]

The article uses both numbers. So which is correct? 23skidoo 05:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's been married four times, and divorced three, his first wife was murdered.--ᎠᏢ462090 20:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

up until the season three finale, only the last three were known to the rest of the team.

Gibbs met his deceased wife, Shannon, for the first time at the train station. He did, however, see her when he stepped out of his fathers store. Whether this was the first time he had seen her is yet to be determined in the show. He also saw her at a fight between him and two other young men. All of these occurences happened in various flashbacks in episode 4, season 6, titled, "Heartland". In season 6, episode 7, Tony tells a new recruit to NCIS that Gibbs was married three times. As known, his wife Sharron and daughter perished, making his total count of wives 4.

>It doesn't mention wife #3, played by Jeri Ryan. See episode "Check," aired January 6, 2015.BellJohnT (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)BellJohnT[reply]

ncis junior or senior partner[edit]

in my opinion it was his senior helping him recover the second time. after all he calls him boss :P

Rule 1&4

Rule 1 was just stated as "Never screw over your partner." Rule 4 was the best way to keep a secret is to tell no 1 the second best was to tell one other person if u most, there is no third best

Burned boats[edit]

I've just been told that in one episode Gibbs claims he burned each boat he completed. Is this true, if so I need to add it to the part that mentions the boat in the article. ~~ Peteb16 22:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know he burned one of his boats because his wife (now of course ex-wife) cheated on him and he had already decided to name it after her. It was in one of the episodes, his words (as far as I remember) were "I could not bare the thought of someone else sailing on her". I don't think he actually burns ALL the boats. 2am 2am (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The line was "and have another man ride off on her" Gibbs was talking to new depuity director of NCIS Jenny in his basement about the boat he was working on now.
Not all boats were burned. In the episode "Outlaws and In-laws" Season 7 Episode 6, a boat Gibbs gave to Mike Franks washed up on shore in Califorina with a dead former Marine in it. In the episode Abby even mentions to Mcgee something along the lines of "I'm going to figure out how he got it out of his basement." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacekeeper 1234 (talkcontribs) 12:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was more under the impression that that boat was named after his first wife, which would make more sense given the fact that she was killed as opposed to the other three divorces. Pueblonative (talk) 04:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gibberish[edit]

Or do I mean Gibbs-erish? Anyhoo, my query regards this passage: "but another technique which he enforced to Abby is the fact to encourage her and the others to work faster (For Example, In Deception (SE3EP13) Abby and McGee are tracking down an internet pervert. Gibbs instructed them to relay the IP address they had to each one within the local community. Abby and McGee tell automatically believe that they have 20 minutes to complete this task as Gibbs always was think do be done quicker. When they tell Gibbs how long they think they have Gibbs replies saying that he was thinking of 10 minutes not 20)." Does anyone have a version of this that wasn't translated to German and back via Babelfish? Optimus Sledge 03:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted it.Richard75 23:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account of MSM Award[edit]

I just watched Season 3, Episode 11, Model Behavior and altered the account of the award, which read:

In season three, when Gibbs receives the NCIS MSM, Tony as usual takes the medal and locks in a drawer where one can see a large amount of medal cases all belonging to Gibbs.

My problems with this wording were that Gibbs does not, strictly, receive the medal. He is awarded the medal, but does not attend the ceremony or at any time touch the medal: it is accepted by Tony on his behalf. Although we are encouraged to conclude that this is a regular occurrence, by Tony's preparedness for the ceremony and the presence of several similar presentation cases in a lock-box in Tony's desk drawer, the use of "as usual" in the foregoing carries the stronger implication that we have seen similar scenes before, which we have not. The word "it" is missing (i.e. it should read "locks it in a drawer"). The word medal is a count noun, not a mass noun, so the use of "amount" in the foregoing is an error: "amount" is properly used only with mass nouns ("number" would've been better).

My changes made the text a few lines longer, which might not be a good thing in an already long article, particularly near the top. The critical point is that we are given to understand that Gibbs regularly receives NCIS medals, but has no interest in them. This point with the detail relegated to an episode-specific page, which exist for many episodes, is probably better.

Age[edit]

Do we know how old Gibbs is? Or at least an estimate? I know that in "The Curse" 1x05, he's revealed to be more than 37 but not "considerably." Do we ever learn for certain? Mukk 00:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He has to be younger than Mark Harmon. Gibbs joined NCIS in late 1991. According to federal law, he could not have been older than 37 when he was hired. Which means that at the very oldest, Gibbs is 52 as of Season 3, which would actually mean he'd have to retire from field work by Season 8! (again, federal law and the 6(c) retirement provisions). But then again, he could be younger.

You also assume that the show must move in real time with the world. West Wing crushed 8+ years of the two presidential terms (+ first campaign) into 7 seasons. That said, from the article's text... if he was between 18 and 20 when he left Stillwater in 1976, it means he was born between 1956 and 1958. The article also states he is a Virgo, which means he was born in late August or early-to-mid September. That means that as of the time of this comment, Gibbs should be somewhere between 50 and 52. -68.209.116.39 (talk) 04:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I am allowed to add into this discussion, I'm apologising in advance. Feel free to delete what follows if it crosses a line.

I accept that the show does not move in real time. I accept there is an anachronism regarding the establishment of Jethro's year of birth but that's really for the scriptwriters to address. As for Gibbs age, it cannot be determined by counting the number of seasons from a canon reference. Seasons are a measure of time for viewers.

The assumption is that a calendar year has elapsed between the start of successive seasons. Given that the Simpson family are fictional characters as well, Bart should be 39 years old if the seasons were used as a measurement of time for a show. The Simpsons have aired over 650 episodes so Bart should be 11, going on 12.

I believe it is safe to assume that while episodes or story arcs unfold over a series of hours, days or weeks, several seasons of the show could theoretically be contained within a few months or a year of real time.

Furthermore, compare most real presidents serving two terms; they look considerably older after 8 years based on the strain of the job. It could be argued that Gibbs has also aged due to the stress of his work. He investigates particularly heinous and graphic crimes, views remains which are in various states of injury and decomposition, has been injured in the line of duty, suffered grief at the loss of his first wife and only daughter as well as experiencing some traumas through the many very young characters he has met during his investigations, children who have lost a parent or who have been traumatised themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cotkuch (talkcontribs) 23:17, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Statement[edit]

Just a statement, that this page needs to be updated. They are now into season 5 and alot more details have been revealed. --203.59.131.101 13:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

salut[edit]

salut je rafole de vous pouver vous menvoyer le titre du film que vous avais fait ou long vous voit le plus posible et plein de photos écce posible sinon repondré moi a dengel.fr@free.fr si vous plaie repondré moi le plus vite posible je m'apelle françoise et vous? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.172.55.38 (talk) 21:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

television project/deletion discussion[edit]

I've added the television infobox to see if we can't bring in some people more knowledgeable about working on tv characters. I also propose removing the Military History infobox. As Gibbs is a fictional character, I don't really think it applies in this instance. Although if anyone can defend it, i'm ertainly not opposed to leaving it there. Also, regarding the current deletion discussion, the most glaring issues seem to me to be that the article is full of Original Research (OR), and is written from an in-universe perspective. What this means is that more third party sources that are reliable need to be added to be sued to establish his notability, and that the article needs to be re-written as if we were looking at it from the outside. While I'm at it, I'll add the OR and In-universe tags to the front to mark it as such. If anybody can think of anybody else can think of anything that can be done, please be go ahead and do it. To participate in the deletion discussion, go here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leroy Jethro Gibbs Umbralcorax (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • correction to above, the OR tag was already added, but I went ahead and added the in-universe tag. Umbralcorax (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why should it be deleted?[edit]

I also don't know why this Article should be deleted. I've read this talk and the only person how wrote, that the article should be deleted, is DavidHOzAu.

(Maybe have misunderstood any statement...)

And it seems to me, that DavidHozAu no longer belongs to wikipedia...

Leroyjgibbs —Preceding comment was added at 20:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OR removed[edit]

Per the discussion at the AfD, I've removed material from this article that was either in-universe, OR, or not specifically referenced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sources for this article[edit]

The version of this article prior to the AfD had what some might consider WP:OR since there were no references. I did a quick check on the EBSCO database at my library and found these articles that might provide references for any interested editors:

  • NCIS SHOCKER! TV Guide; 3/13/2006, Vol. 54 Issue 11, p32-32, 1p, 2c
  • The MVP of NCIS. TV Guide; 3/27/2005, Vol. 53 Issue 13, p30-32, 3p, 2c
  • NCIS. TV Guide; 2/6/2005, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p109-109, 1/4p, 1bw
  • NCIS. TV Guide; 11/14/2004, Vol. 52 Issue 46, p110-110, 1/4p, 1bw
  • NCIS (TV Program). TV Guide; 9/26/2004, Vol. 52 Issue 39, p107-107, 1/4p, 1bw
  • NCIS. TV Guide; 9/24/2007, Vol. 55 Issue 39, p70-70, 1/4p, 1c
  • NCIS. TV Guide; 9/17/2007, Vol. 55 Issue 38, p55-55, 1/3p, 1bw
  • NCIS. TV Guide; 3/31/2008, Vol. 56 Issue 14, p36-36, 1/4p, 1bw
  • Naval Gaze. Entertainment Weekly; 2/23/2007 Issue 922, p89-89, 1p, 2c
  • TOP SECRET ADMIRERS. TV Guide; 1/9/2006, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p22-25, 4p, 6c
  • MARK HARMON. TV Guide; 4/28/2008, Vol. 56 Issue 17, p22-24, 3p, 4bw --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In OR?[edit]

I can understand not wanting to be known as Jethro, but was "Leroy Jethro" planned from 1/1, or was it a gaffe by later-season writers who didn't read the show bible? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 13:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers[edit]

There really ought to be a spoilers note at the top of this page, since it details information (even in the first paragraph) from season six which hasn't been internationally released yet. KLF Fitton (talk) 17:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:SPOILERS. McWomble (talk) 04:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

Decided to make some notes as I watch NCIS again from the beginning. Maybe there's enough for me to summarise it into the main article. Will also attempt to note down the "rules" that are often quoted.

  • Weapon - Sig Sauer (ref S01E01- when told to leave it behind when going on AF1). May be that's the standard weapon issued to all NCIS agents. Recall Ari spoke of Caitlin carrying a Sig. - seeS01E15 when Ari first meets Caitlin.
  • A character trait - He doesn't understand young stuff and sometimes has to have it explained. eg emo music S01E02, phat party in S01E01
  • Tech challenged. Doesn't know much about computers, mobile phones etc. Example - Didn't know how to use call blocking in S01E01. Didn't recognise an XD card when he saw it. (S01E19) No idea what (or how to use) a USB memory stick. Agreed when this was pointed out to him. even said he preferred to use a notebook and pencil instead of a PDA. S01E16. (However did start using a PDA in S01E18)
  • Needs spectacles. Number of times he has problems reading and had to squint or adjust the distance.
  • Doesn't use cologne. S01E08
  • Only child. S01E12
  • Slap the face is humiliating, back of the head is a wake up call. S02E05
  • Bottle of bourbon next to paint thinners in the basement/garage where boat built. S02E05

Linnah (talk) 00:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Give it to me in English"[edit]

Can't source it (a perennial problem ;D), but FYI, this is a variation on a theme familiar in pulp SF, one so common it became known in some circles as "the dumb girlfriend". While Buck Marvellous is off fighting the minions of Emperor Chaotica, Dr. Brilliantine is devising a fabulous & (of course) highly technical way of saving the planet. Since the average audience was a 12 year old boy, this naturally required explanation that was accessible, hence the dumb girlfirend. Gibbs is the first case I've seen of Buck's own stupidity (why else would you voluntarily take on the minions all alone? Every time?) being made the butt of the joke. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 13:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War and protection[edit]

This redirect war is pointless and will only lead to all involved being blocked. Please discuss this matter, because I have protected this article for a month to the point that only sysops can edit it. -MBK004 02:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But Ducky didn't know about Shannon and Kelly[edit]

"As revealed by Ducky in an episode in Season 3, in his younger years Gibbs was like Tony, personality wise, before his first wife Shannon and daughter Kelly, were murdered."

Ducky only knew Gibbs after he joined NIS (before the NCIS name change), likely while he was Mike Franks' probie. This is discussed in "Hiatus, Part 2" at the end of Season 3 (Ducky is speaking with Gibbs doctor, coincidentally the one that also treated him in Desert Storm). Shannon and Kelly were murdered while Gibbs was still a marine sniper; Franks led the investigation. Gibbs joined NIS after coming back from Mexico (to find Shannon and Kelly's murderer). By the end of "Kill Ari" Parts 1 & 2, it is revealed that the only person at NCIS that knows about Shannon and Kelly is Ziva David, because she had done a thorough dossier on Gibbs for Ari Haswari.

Since the specific Season 3 episode is not referenced, I cannot readily remember the details of this conversation/statement of Ducky's. It happened, but under the story's circumstances, Ducky would have to be insinuating something else caused the personality change. Perhaps it would be the multiple divorces that Ducky believes jaded Gibbs, or even more likely, Caitlyn's death.

In support of the Caitlyn's-death theory: Season 1: Episode 3 "Sea Dog," Gibbs flirts with the tv reporter over lunch; Episode 4 "The Immortals," Gibbs is rather playful & cheeky when Tony gives Kate a bikini from Puerto Rico (bottoms with a matching hat). In the first and second seasons, Gibbs could be described as a more experienced and mature Tony. There is definitely a character change after Caitlyn's death.

There is a similar character change for Tony in "Agent Afloat" (S6,E115) when he is seen again after Season 5, Ep 113 "Judgement Day, Part 2."

64.183.51.26 (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)ScuitoIsMyHero[reply]

There is a problem with the theory that Kate's death led to the personality change, because in the conversstion with Ducky, it's clearly evident that Tony doesn't know about this other Gibbs' personality, and by that time, Tony has worked with Gibbs for at least 4 years, and he worked with him for at least 18 months prior to Kate's coming on as an NCIS Agent. There has been one clear indication that the primary reason for the 'personality change' has more to do with his job than anything else. Gibbs is in charge, and being in charge does not lend itself to the happy-go-lucky demeanor that Ducky implies he used to have. We see a bit of that demeanor while Gibbs is talking to Franks in "Hiatus"(3x23-24) while he has amnesia, and in the episode "Bounce" (6x16) when Tony is temporarily in charge of the team, and Gibbs says clearly that he doesn't normally act that way because it's not his job. As a note, Tony is less happy-go-lucky while he is in charge as well, even if he gives silly gifts (4x1 Shalom). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.182.59 (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gibbs' Rules[edit]

Rule:

  • 1. Never let suspects stay together. S01E01
  • 2. Always wear gloves at a crime scene. S01E01
  • 7. Always be specific when you lie. S01E23
  • 9. Never go anywhere without a knife. S01E13
  • 12. Never date a co-worker. S01E15
  • 23. Never mess with a marine's coffee if you want to live. S01E09
  • (unnumbered) Never apologize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.236.90 (talk) 20:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linnah (talk) 03:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding rules here because the article page is locked.

Rule #7 Always be specific when you lie. Ref: Season 1, Episode 23, "Reveille" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.180.104 (talk) 14:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3rd rule: Never be unreachable. Ref: Season 3, episode 13. Dracoster (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
13th rule: Never involve lawyers, things tend to become nasty. Ref: Season 6, episode 7
15th: Always work as a team. Ref: Season 5, episode 5. Dracoster (talk) 22:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidated list[edit]

Please add more!!!

Rule:

  • 1. Never let suspects stay together. S01E01
  • ?Rule 1 was just stated as "Never screw over your partner."
  • 2. Always wear gloves at a crime scene. S01E01
  • 3. Never be unreachable. Ref: Season 3, episode 13.
  • 4. was the best way to keep a secret is to tell no 1 the second best was to tell one other person if u most, there is no third best
  • 7. Always be specific when you lie. S01E23
  • Rule 7: Always be specific when you lie. Ref: Season 1, Episode 23, "Reveille"
  • 8. Never take anything for granted. Ref: "The episode where Timothy shoots a cop" -- Mjquin_id (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • 9. Never go anywhere without a knife. S01E13
  • 12. Never date a co-worker. S01E15
  • 13. Never involve lawyers, things tend to become nasty. Ref: Season 6, episode 7
  • 15. Always work as a team. Ref: Season 5, episode 5.
  • 23. Never mess with a marine's coffee if you want to live. S01E09 and S02E09
  • (unnumbered) Never apologize.

-- Mjquin_id (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rule 38: Your case, your lead Ref: S06E16 Bounce 76.115.138.214 (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)ScuitoIsMyHero[reply]

  • 40. If you think someone's out to get you, they are. S07E22.Jamen Somasu (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that one of the most-often-mentioned rules is missing: "Do not apologize!" Does anyone know by heart an early episode that features it? HMallison (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number 1 and number 3 were used twice but with a different rules:

  • 1. Never let suspects stay together. S01E01
  • 1. Never screw over your partner. S04E14
  • 3. Don't believe what your told. Double-check. S01E01
  • 3. Never be unreachable. S03E13

The "never apoligize" rule got a number in season 7 but was used before multiple times without a number:

  • 6. Never say you're sorry - it's a sign of weakness. E7S12

Some of the rules listed above were used in multiple episodes:

  • 9. Never go anywhere without a knife. S01E13, S01E20, S03E10
  • 12. Never date a co-worker. S01E15, S06E24

Rules that were missing in the list above:

  • 11. When the job is done, walk away. S06E24
  • 18. It's better to seek forgiveness than ask permission. S03E04
  • 22. Never, ever bother Gibbs in interrogation. S04E10

Veerleverbr (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gibbs' rules - Inclusion in this article[edit]

The Gibbs' Rules list is getting very large, has had a few questionable (WP:OR) edits popping in and ones where there is disagreement on the exact wording. I had thought it has been agreed in discussion that if we allowed trivia such as this to be included on the Leroy Jethro Gibbs page, it would spread and be impossible to keep under control (note: Aussie and I agreed that we remembered it being discussed - but can no longer locate where the discussion is). Anyone else have an idea on this? Perhaps a separate page for the rules to keep the character page from getting too unwieldy? Trista (Triste Tierra - cannot log in at work) 24.176.191.234 (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the most recent deletion discussion, one of the points raised in favour of deletion of this article was that it contained fancruft. Gibbs' rules were specifically mentioned as an example of fancruft.[1] For this reason, to discourage further AfD nominations (the article has been nominated thrice thus far), I've been deleting them when they're added as they do appear to be fancruft. However, I am open to discussion of this matter. Can anyone explain why they aren't fancruft? Inclusion of the list in the article is not appropriate without real world encylopaedic analysis supported, of course, by citations from reliable sources. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Internet you can find multiple lists of Gibbs' rules. None of them is complete. Some of them contain rules that were made up in the style of the actual rules without actually having been on the show as a rule. Would be nice to get a correct and complete set of rules somewhere and for me wikipedia seems to be right place for an accurate list. If we add references to the show(s) they were on and give the exact quotation, I don't see why that would be any more fancruft then all the other stuff about the show or Gibbs'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veerleverbr (talkcontribs) 20:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that "Gibbs' Rules" are an important device, key to understanding the character. The writers of the show have continually used this device to further evolve the character. And for new viewers of the series, it becomes one of the first questions asked: "What's with / What are these "rules" they keep talking about?" It seems important enough to the Gibbs character to keep these rules coming, though it even might be that the writers of the show do not have a running tally of them.

Gibbs' Rules are the code; it's the code of honor that the character lives by, works by. The character puts this code above the rules and regulations of NCIS at times, evidenced most recently by the last few episodes of this season. He also instills this code in the other characters; the writers of the show have also given at least DiNozzo's character license for rules of his own, as evidenced in the first few episodes of Season 4.

It even seems, to reference the season 7 finale episode "Rule Fifty-One," that there might not be a complete numerical list: In the closing scene, Gibbs opens a box that contains scraps of paper with his rules written on them--up until this moment, the audience and characters believe that Gibbs has never written them down. Rifling through them, he remembers a conversation with his wife, Shannon; she says, "Shouldn't you have started with number one."

Is a complete list of "Gibbs' Rules" important to only a small percentage of fans? Perhaps. Are "Gibbs' Rules" important enough to mention? Yes; this is a device that the writers have continually used to evolve the character, so it should be important enough to mention. It is also important to mention that there is not a complete list, and that there exist inconsistencies in the language and the numbering of rules (which I could argue to be an intentional accident by the writers, anyway).

Rule 51: Sometimes you're wrong. (Written on the back of rule 13: Never involve a lawyer.) 64.183.51.26 (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)ScuitoIsMyHero[reply]

"I'd argue that "Gibbs' Rules" are an important device" - This may be the case but simply listing the rules is not sufficient. To justify inclusion a third party analysis, backed up by citations from reliable sources is required. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I recently discovered Leroy J. Gibbs, which is a redirect, originally created as an article about Gibbs. An AfD resulted in that article being redirected to List of NCIS characters. I've now changed it to redirect here but I found that the original, fairly well written article still exists.[2] It's unreferenced but it would seem appropriate to merge what can be used here. The format needs a clean up, but it's a good basis for improving the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What should really happen is the Leroy J. Gibbs article be moved into this one, but to do that a request must be made here. I say this because this article (Leroy Jethro Gibbs) already exists and the move can't be done without an administrator's help. El Greco(talk) 23:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand why that is necessary in this case. The version of that page that I linked to is essentially the same as the version that resulted in the decision to redirect. It's a little top-heavy on unnecessary fluff and it's unreferenced. This article at least has some references. The content history of the other article is very short compared to this (10 edits by 2 editors vs several hundred edits by many users). The version of the article that we want is going to be a combination of both articles and it's going to need some work to get it there. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's the thing, since both articles are about the same person, the page history should follow that rather than copying and pasting info from the J. Gibbs article to the Jethro Gibbs article per Wiki policy. El Greco(talk) 21:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More info about wifes[edit]

I've added some information about his family (surely with sources)[3]. Why it is reverted and I recive that[4] notice? Something wrong is with my English? (possibly, 'cos I'm from Russia). But information I've add is true, so I ask some English users to be so kind and maybe correct some of my verbs or spelling. --Аракаси (talk) 13:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll fix your spelling and grammar. Abby 82 (talk) 13:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the numbers[edit]

Can we safely include Gibb's service number, 817657320? It's in "Deliverance". TREKphiler hit me ♠ 12:27 & 12:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification of November 10th as his birthday[edit]

The birthday of the United States Marine Corps is November 10th. During this day all current and former Marines celebrate this date by saying "Happy Birthday" to each other. I know because I am married to a Marine and my real birthday is November 10th. Every year, my husband says "Happy Birthday Marine Corps" before be says "Happy Birthday" to me.

So when Abby says "Happy Birthday" to Gibbs at the end of show, she is saying that because he is Marine and that show is during the time of the Marine Corps birthday celebration not because it is his real birthday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cehsu73 (talkcontribs) 01:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could Jethro Gibbs be based on a real Marine sniper?[edit]

A few weeks ago I met a guy who told me he had done some of his Marine sniper training with a real Jethro Gibbs. From the other stories he told I believe that he really was a Marine sniper. This would be very interesting if true but obviously doesn't belong in the article until it is confirmed. Can anyone positively confirm or refute this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1supertrucker (talkcontribs) 16:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean for this to be included in the sniper question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kring0bc (talkcontribs) 07:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

N.B.: The temporary internment markers seen in Gibbs' flashbacks during "Hiatus", as well as the dates of death in the NCIS files on their murder places the actual date of Shannon and Kelly Gibbs' deaths as February 29, 1991. [1]

I don't know if this was in the file since I haven't seen the episode in a while, but the date is impossible. There was no February 29, 1991; [2] 1988 or 1992 were the leap years during this time frame. Someone may want to note the date inconsistency.

I agree the rules should be listed, a link to its own page may be the best way. As to citation, citing the episode is the best way and mention any differences if a rule is given twice, but with different responses.Someone who creates a list of 50, now 51, rules generally indicates a certain type of personality and that is an important aspect of a person. He is a fictional character so people may not consider it relevant.

There are numerous lists of Marine snipers that are publicly available that would show if there was a real-life Gibbs. If there was, why doesn't the show mention it, or does it somewhere in the credits? Considering what we see of Gibbs, I would be surprised if he existed since many of the things his character does/did would violate a variety of laws. Not to mention, the real-life Gibbs would have a great lawsuit against the show and the network.

It is also unlikely the show would use the name of a real-life person. The show could be basing it on a real-life person and not using their real name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kring0bc (talkcontribs) 07:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

kring0bc Kring0bc (talk) 07:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any link with a real sniper requires reliable sources so it's original research for now. Fiction doesn't have to follow the rules of the real world so 1991 not being a leap year in the real world is not an issue. There was mention of the leap year in the article but it was removed for that reason. Gibbs' rules have been excluded from the article because they constitute fancruft. This was a specific point raised during the discussion last time the article was nominated for deletion. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Hernandez[edit]

Why did Pedro Hernandez murder Gibbs's family? --Boycool (talk) 16:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, Shannon was a witness testifying against him. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You make me weak[edit]

Worht mentioning Gibbs' mottoe "Don't apologize—it's a sign of weakness." is a lift from Marion Morrison's "She Wore a Yellow Ribbon"? Mike Franks smack DiNozzo 23:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you can find a reliable source that confirms it. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

time at NCIS[edit]

the article makes mention of a contradiction. i don't see how. 16 years in season 4 and 19 years in season 8. what's the problem? i was born in 1970. i'll be 42 in 2012,at some point. but for the first 9 months of 2012, i'm still 41. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.85.139 (talk) 22:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't season 8 of NCIS, it was season 8 of JAG, which occurred before NCIS aired. "Ice Queen" aired on April 22, 2003 and that's when Gibbs said it was 19 years. In "Singled Out", which aired over 3 years later on October 3, 2006, it was only 16 years. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:28, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and Citation Section[edit]

Some got this RIGHT (correct) !!! I see so many other places it is probably wrong. Correct in that 3 ribbons across to a row, and with top row only 2 across properly centered. On one I tried to set it properly and did not succeed. In many cases the error is 4 ribbons awards across on a row. Praise and admiration to the editor responsible Wfoj3 (talk) 01:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PTSD[edit]

Just because a few unqualified journalists have failed to discern that Gibb's has PTSD, doesn't mean that it should be removed. The OR policy in this regard is a clear Encyclopedic failure. Any good psychologist knows that he has all the symptoms of PTSD... and I find it relevant to include it. You don't really need citations for something that *should* be common knowledge. --JT2958 (talk) 11:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The very beginning of Wikipedia:Verifiability is In Wikipedia, verifiability means that anyone using the encyclopedia can check the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. What you added is classic original research and is not permitted. That's not a "clear Encyclopedic failure". It's specifically meant to stop editors adding their own opinions to articles. --AussieLegend () 12:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Failed math[edit]

This article is embarrassing when it says he was born May 2, 1954 and then he joined the Marine Corps in 1976 at age 18 The character would have become 22 on May 2, 1976. If he joined the Marines in 1976 he was 21 or 22. I propose to edit the section to state that he joined the Marines at "21 or 22." Maybe the scripting intent is to make him too late to have served in Vietnam. Lots of men born in 1952 served in the Vietnam conflict. If there is no consensus to change his birth date, then the 18 year old claim has to go. Edison (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a work of fiction and fiction doesn't have to follow the rules of the real world. What you're concerned about is just a continuity issue and these are in every work of fiction. The birthdate and the age are both sourced from the episodes so we can't just change them. --AussieLegend () 08:56, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When Gibbs joined the service[edit]

In the episode “Heartland”, Gibbs states that he joined the corp in 1976. The flashbacks show the town decorated for the Bi-Centennial 2601:347:4100:4CB0:51D3:127B:1753:37BB (talk) 02:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]