Talk:Lazarus (Travie McCoy album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lazarus (Travie McCoy album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lazarus (Travie McCoy album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lazarus (Travie McCoy album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General notes[edit]

Lead

01. "Lazarus is the debut album by Gym Class Heroes frontman Travie McCoy" - do you mean "lead singer"? Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. "Upon the album's release, Lazarus debuted at number 25 on the U.S. Billboard 200 chart with sales of 15,000 copies" - Number 25 needs to be spelled out completely (number twenty-five) per WP:ORDINAL. And link Billboard 200 and not just Billboard. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
03. Link Billboard Hot 100. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
04. Wasn't Billionaire a lead single? Comment: Yes indeed. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
05. "The songs "Need You" and "We'll Be Alright" have also been released as singles." - promotional singles or promotional recordings?

Comment: I am not sure what the difference is, the two links redirect to the same page. What do you mean? Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

06. "positive to mixed" to "mixed to positive" Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
07. Per WP:Lead which states "The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of its most important aspects". Please consider adding the major aspects of the article.

Secondary notes[edit]

Lead

Number four hasn't been addressed. I am pretty sure it was the lead single (especially if it was the first single released). Number five; I see where you are coming from. What I meant was, were these promotional singles or just singles? (there is a difference).

Comment: I think that they were just singles, as they were released several months after the release of the album and they were not released to create a buzz for the album. Is that okay? Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Background

01. "while Gym Class was on the road promoting its 2008 album The Quilt." - remove "its 2008 album" and add the year of release to The Quilt in (parenthesis). Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. 808s & Heartbreak - year of release should also be in (parenthesis) Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recording and production

01. "1994 debut album Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik." - per above, remove "1994" and replace it in (parenthesis) Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Music

01. "Speaking of the album, McCoy stated" - sounds a bit ORISH to me. Would wanna consider revising, so it doesn't sound like you are in an interview. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. "The album's opener" ---> "The album's opening track" Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
03. Ahhha! so Billionaire was the lead single. You would want to include that in the lead per WP:Lead. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

01. "escapism" - wiktionary this ---> escapism Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. "nostalgic" - wiktionary this as well ---> nostalgic Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Packaging and title

01. The album artwork ---> The album's artwork Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion

01. "He plans to tour extensively to promote the album in order to" - this sentence needs to be written in past-tense tone. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chart performance

01. "Billboard Hot 100 at 92" - link Billboard Hot 100 and spell out completely "at number ninety-two" per WP:ORDINAL. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. "number 25" - needs to be spelled out "number twenty-five" Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
03. "peaking at number 25" - per above. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
04. "number 11 on the Billboard Digital Albums charts" - spell out the number --> "number eleven" Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
05. "at number 69, its peak position thus far" - consider rewording and peaked at number sixty-nine. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
06. "reaching a peak of 4" - consider rewording peaked at number-four Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
07. "The song was listed number 6" - consider rewording The song was positioned at number-six Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
08. "and peaked at number 36" - spell the number out completely ---> "number thirty-six" Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

01. "generally positive to mixed" - consider rewording generally mixed to positive. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
02. The Papercut Chronicles - needs the year of release in (parenthesis) Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chart performance

01. Needs references. Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final notes[edit]

This article needs a bit of help. I am going to put it On hold for further development, up to seven (7) days. Please address the concerns that were stated. Take care and good luck, AJona1992 (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions! I believe I have addressed everything. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fast response! I'm currently going to re-read the article to make sure that everything has been taking care of, AJona1992 (talk) 03:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chart performance

01. "number 11 on the Billboard Digital Albums charts" - number 11 needs to be spelled out ---> number eleven.

This is the only concern. Just fix this and the article passes, AJona1992 (talk) 03:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done :D Basilisk4u (talk) 03:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed the article. Congrats! AJona1992 (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks so much :) Basilisk4u (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lazarus (Travie McCoy album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100524114941/http://www.chartattack.com:80/news/83618/travie-mccoy-celebrates-second-coming-with-lazarus to http://www.chartattack.com/news/83618/travie-mccoy-celebrates-second-coming-with-lazarus

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lazarus (Travie McCoy album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160411072813/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16691 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16691

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]