Talk:Latreillia
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Disambiguation[edit]
The more I think about it, it seems to me that Latreillia should be the crab, with a hatnote pointing to the fly.--Curtis Clark (talk) 17:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, partly. That would be consistent with the "principle of two", and I think that would be better in the long run. In the short term, though, after some thought I made the dab page because of the pages I found elsewhere on the web that mash together the two genera. Do you feel strongly about this? --Una Smith (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think the key point is that the fly is a junior homonym. If it were a plant and animal, a dab page would be just the ticket. But, by the ICZN, there is no fly named Latreillia. Seekers for the crab shouldn't have the second jump, and seekers for the fly will not have to jump further. But, no, I don't feel strongly about it.--Curtis Clark (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Latreillia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606061453/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)